Politics and Technology of Control: Introduction: Difference between revisions

From Technologies and Politics of Control
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:




== Preparation ==
== Preparation (Assignment "Zero") ==
To get the discussion started, please come prepared to share three ways in which you think the Net is changing the world -- and provide examples (e.g. article, website). If you are not joining the class in person, please post your thoughts to the [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/questions/ Question Tool] (pick "InternetSociety2009") before class starts.
To get this discussion started, take some time to read through the three blog posts below, published by Google in their relationship with China. Come to class (or e-mail us: thwang@cyber.law.harvard.edu) with some brief thoughts (1 page, double space), responding to:
 
* What do you think was the right approach on Google's part?
* What kind of arguments or ideological stands would you make to support your position one way or the other?
* What do you feel these articles show about the nature of the internet?


== Readings ==
== Readings ==
[http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~zs/decl.html John Perry Barlow, A Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace]
[http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/01/google-in-china.html Google In China (2006)]
 
[http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html Google in China (2010)]
[http://www.cluetrain.com Chris Locke, Doc Searls & David Weinberger, Cluetrain Manifesto] (just the manifesto)
[http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/12/google%E2%80%99s-china-stance-more-about-business-than-thwarting-evil/ TechCrunch, More About Business Than Thwarting Evil (2010)]
 
[http://www.legalaffairs.org/printerfriendly.msp?id=961 Jack Goldsmith & Tim Wu, Digital Borders]
 
[http://futureoftheinternet.org/ Jonathan Zittrain, The Future of the Internet - Chapters 1 & 2]


== Videos Watched in Class ==
== Videos Watched in Class ==

Revision as of 09:56, 22 January 2010

The Net has great potential for “good” (e.g. innovation, economic growth, education, and access to information), and is likewise is a great platform for the bawdy, tawdry and illegal. Is this platform about fundamental social, political and economic change, or about easier access to pornography, cheap pharmaceuticals, free music and poker at home? This question leads us to a host of interesting issues that weave their way through the course related to openness, access, regulatory control, free speech, anonymity, intellectual property rights, democracy, transparency, norms and values, economic and cultural change and cyber-terrorism, as well as scamsters and thieves.


Preparation (Assignment "Zero")

To get this discussion started, take some time to read through the three blog posts below, published by Google in their relationship with China. Come to class (or e-mail us: thwang@cyber.law.harvard.edu) with some brief thoughts (1 page, double space), responding to:

  • What do you think was the right approach on Google's part?
  • What kind of arguments or ideological stands would you make to support your position one way or the other?
  • What do you feel these articles show about the nature of the internet?

Readings

Google In China (2006) Google in China (2010) TechCrunch, More About Business Than Thwarting Evil (2010)

Videos Watched in Class

Class Discussion

Links