Internet, Law - Revision history

Csrobertson: Internet Privacy Forum (a.k.a. the XOXO Debate) moved to Internet, Law: revert

2007-05-09T03:22:49Z

Internet Privacy Forum (a.k.a. the XOXO Debate) moved to Internet, Law: revert

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:22, 9 May 2007
(No difference)

Csrobertson at 03:21, 9 May 2007

2007-05-09T03:21:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 9 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~STILL A WORK IN PROGRESS HERE - If I had one of those old-school "uner construction" signs, I'd put it here.~~


	~~A downloadable recording of this event is available [http://www.esnips.com/doc/9ed308e7-b94c-45c1-8568-4455eea1ec61/Apr_5_2007_Harvard_panel_on_AutoAdmit here.]~~


	~~Date: April 5~~

	~~Moderator: [http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/facdir.php?id=48 Professor Charles Nesson], Harvard Law School~~

	~~Panelists:~~

	~~[http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/facdir.php?id=534 Professor Mark Tushnet], Harvard Law School~~

	~~Dina Lassow, National Women's Law Center~~

	~~Robert Trestan, Anti-Defamation League~~

	~~[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendy_Kaminer Wendy Kaminer], lawyer and social critic~~

	~~[http://www.naymz.com/search/michael/fertik/792233 Michael Fertik], HLS '05, CEO of ReputationDefender~~

	Anthony Ciolli, the founder and former webmaster of XOXO, had been invited and was planning to attend, but was disinvited at the 11th hour by the Dean of Students Office. The official reason given was that that the DOS was concerned that the panel would be limited only to discussion of XOXO if Ciolli were to attend, and that the panel was intended to cover a broader range of issues. However, particularly due to Fertick's presence, XOXO was the the main topic of discussion, and the quality of the discussion therefore suffered somewhat because the site was not properly represented. Professor Nesson took Ciolli's point of view, and although he did a good job of arguing the legal points, he was unfamiliar with the site's history and the details of the particular events in question.




	~~Our own Amanda was involved in the organization of the event.~~

Csrobertson at 01:37, 9 May 2007

2007-05-09T01:37:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:37, 9 May 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Robert Trestan, Anti-Defamation League		Robert Trestan, Anti-Defamation League

	Wendy Kaminer, lawyer and social critic		[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendy_Kaminer Wendy Kaminer], lawyer and social critic

	Michael Fertik, HLS '05, CEO of ReputationDefender		[http://www.naymz.com/search/michael/fertik/792233 Michael Fertik], HLS '05, CEO of ReputationDefender

	Anthony Ciolli, the founder and former webmaster of XOXO, had been invited and was planning to attend, but was disinvited at the 11th hour by the Dean of Students Office. The official reason given was that that the DOS was concerned that the panel would be limited only to discussion of XOXO if Ciolli were to attend, and that the panel was intended to cover a broader range of issues. However, particularly due to Fertick's presence, XOXO was the the main topic of discussion, and the quality of the discussion therefore suffered somewhat because the site was not properly represented. Professor Nesson took Ciolli's point of view, and although he did a good job of arguing the legal points, he was unfamiliar with the site's history and the details of the particular events in question.		Anthony Ciolli, the founder and former webmaster of XOXO, had been invited and was planning to attend, but was disinvited at the 11th hour by the Dean of Students Office. The official reason given was that that the DOS was concerned that the panel would be limited only to discussion of XOXO if Ciolli were to attend, and that the panel was intended to cover a broader range of issues. However, particularly due to Fertick's presence, XOXO was the the main topic of discussion, and the quality of the discussion therefore suffered somewhat because the site was not properly represented. Professor Nesson took Ciolli's point of view, and although he did a good job of arguing the legal points, he was unfamiliar with the site's history and the details of the particular events in question.

Csrobertson at 17:42, 6 May 2007

2007-05-06T17:42:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 6 May 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Date: April 5		Date: April 5

	Moderator: Professor Charles Nesson, Harvard Law School		Moderator: [http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/facdir.php?id=48 Professor Charles Nesson], Harvard Law School

	Panelists:		Panelists:

	Professor Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law School		[http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/facdir.php?id=534 Professor Mark Tushnet], Harvard Law School

	Dina Lassow, National Women's Law Center		Dina Lassow, National Women's Law Center

Csrobertson at 17:37, 6 May 2007

2007-05-06T17:37:32Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 STILL A WORK IN PROGRESS HERE - If I had one of those old-school "uner construction" signs, I'd put it here.
-On April 5, a panel discussion...
 Anthony Ciolli, the founder and former webmaster of XOXO, had been invited and was planning to attend, but was disinvited at the 11th hour by the Dean of Students Office.  The official reason given was that that the DOS was concerned that the panel would be limited only to discussion of XOXO if Ciolli were to attend, and that the panel was intended to cover a broader range of issues.  However, particularly due to Fertick's presence, XOXO was the the main topic of discussion, and the quality of the discussion therefore suffered somewhat because the site was not properly represented. Professor Nesson took Ciolli's point of view, and although he did a good job of arguing the legal points, he was unfamiliar with the site's history and the details of the particular events in question.
@@ Line 8: / Line 26: @@
 Our own Amanda was involved in the organization of the event.

Csrobertson at 17:32, 6 May 2007

2007-05-06T17:32:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 6 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			STILL A WORK IN PROGRESS HERE - If I had one of those old-school "uner construction" signs, I'd put it here.

	On April 5, a panel discussion...		On April 5, a panel discussion...

Csrobertson at 17:31, 6 May 2007

2007-05-06T17:31:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 6 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			On April 5, a panel discussion...

			Anthony Ciolli, the founder and former webmaster of XOXO, had been invited and was planning to attend, but was disinvited at the 11th hour by the Dean of Students Office. The official reason given was that that the DOS was concerned that the panel would be limited only to discussion of XOXO if Ciolli were to attend, and that the panel was intended to cover a broader range of issues. However, particularly due to Fertick's presence, XOXO was the the main topic of discussion, and the quality of the discussion therefore suffered somewhat because the site was not properly represented. Professor Nesson took Ciolli's point of view, and although he did a good job of arguing the legal points, he was unfamiliar with the site's history and the details of the particular events in question.




			Our own Amanda was involved in the organization of the event.

	A downloadable recording of this event is available [http://www.esnips.com/doc/9ed308e7-b94c-45c1-8568-4455eea1ec61/Apr_5_2007_Harvard_panel_on_AutoAdmit here.]		A downloadable recording of this event is available [http://www.esnips.com/doc/9ed308e7-b94c-45c1-8568-4455eea1ec61/Apr_5_2007_Harvard_panel_on_AutoAdmit here.]

Csrobertson at 17:21, 6 May 2007

2007-05-06T17:21:29Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:21, 6 May 2007
Line 1:	Line 1:
		A downloadable recording of this event is available [http://www.esnips.com/doc/9ed308e7-b94c-45c1-8568-4455eea1ec61/Apr_5_2007_Harvard_panel_on_AutoAdmit here.]

Csrobertson: Internet, Law moved to Internet Privacy Forum (a.k.a. the XOXO Debate): the previous title made no sense.

2007-05-06T17:13:58Z

Internet, Law moved to Internet Privacy Forum (a.k.a. the XOXO Debate): the previous title made no sense.

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:13, 6 May 2007
(No difference)

Csrobertson at 17:12, 6 May 2007

2007-05-06T17:12:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 6 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~I'm getting ready to post this article soon.~~