Von Hippel questions: Difference between revisions

From Internet, Law & Politics 2007
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Questions for Prof. von Hippel, Apr. 17 class:
Questions for Prof. von Hippel, Apr. 17 class:
*In some instances, manufacturers produce a product with the expectation a user will modify parts of it.  For example, Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) software packages such as UG NX and TeamCenter Engineering are built with a suite of tools available that all (or almost all) users find necessary.  These programs also allow a high degree of user customization to tailor the product to the particular application.  Individual users can re-work sections of code to customize the application.  While this is similar in some aspects to open source development, it differs in that the UG kernel is still proprietary and a particular user’s innovations are not generally shared with others (partially because they are so user specific).  Additionally, the manufacturer provides some level of support to aid users in customizing portions of the code.
**To what extent are the positive aspects of user innovation realized in this model and to what extent are they limited? 
**Are there other (existing or potential) applications of user/manufacturer cooperation on innovation?

Revision as of 15:24, 17 April 2007

Questions for Prof. von Hippel, Apr. 17 class:

  • In some instances, manufacturers produce a product with the expectation a user will modify parts of it. For example, Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) software packages such as UG NX and TeamCenter Engineering are built with a suite of tools available that all (or almost all) users find necessary. These programs also allow a high degree of user customization to tailor the product to the particular application. Individual users can re-work sections of code to customize the application. While this is similar in some aspects to open source development, it differs in that the UG kernel is still proprietary and a particular user’s innovations are not generally shared with others (partially because they are so user specific). Additionally, the manufacturer provides some level of support to aid users in customizing portions of the code.
    • To what extent are the positive aspects of user innovation realized in this model and to what extent are they limited?
    • Are there other (existing or potential) applications of user/manufacturer cooperation on innovation?