The argument against: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:36, 14 February 2007

Sites like Global Voices only attract save-the-world types who do a lot of talking but don't have any real power to effect change. Nobody else will see it.
If the stories on Global Voices were salient to enough of any given population that their outrage would make a difference, the mainstream media would pick up the story itself. These bloggers are just white noise in the background. As gripping as their stories might be, there won't be more people that care enough to put down their latte and do something about it just because it's online.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Tentative Arguments:
+===Tentative Arguments:===
-*sites like global voices only attract save-the-world types, and nobody else will see it.
+*Sites like Global Voices only attract save-the-world types who do a lot of talking but don't have any real power to effect change.  Nobody else will see it.
+*If the stories on Global Voices were salient to enough of any given population that their outrage would make a difference, the mainstream media would pick up the story itself.  These bloggers are just white noise in the background.  As gripping as their stories might be, there won't be more people that care enough to put down their latte and do something about it just because it's online.