Danray: New page: == Brainstorming (On earlier topic: OpenID) == === Title === OpenId and Internet Governance :: '''One of the other groups has a fun title (all together now for great justice dot org). Can...

2009-02-04T01:17:12Z

New page: == Brainstorming (On earlier topic: OpenID) == === Title === OpenId and Internet Governance :: '''One of the other groups has a fun title (all together now for great justice dot org). Can...

New page

== Brainstorming (On earlier topic: OpenID) ==
=== Title ===

OpenId and Internet Governance
:: '''One of the other groups has a fun title (all together now for great justice dot org). Can we have one too? --Dan'''
:: '''Once exams end. --Joshua'''

=== Precis ===

* Internet Regulation (as it relates specifically to online safety and security)
* Privacy and anonymity as they relate to structures of control on the Internet
: JZ: I like the idea of a case study, because the topic is too big otherwise. Would not mind someone from openID or even 2 competing groups talk about what they offer, and identify a problem that gives one of them a headache. My guesses on headaches:
:: At what layer of the internet is appropriate for identity?
:: How do you achieve critical mass, do you need the help of government or the help of something that's more than just the market?
: Groups to look at, potentially:
:: OpenID
:: Higgins project
:: Trustfuse (Auren Hoffman)
: And then see which group is most interesting and bring them in. The problem ID architecture is meant to solve - what is it? What are the new problems it creates? What are the barriers to implementing this solution?

=== Guest wish list (if any) ===
* As an academic, you couldn't do better than Daniel Solove. If we do hone in on a very specific topic, though, we could go for someone with more specialized experience. [[User:Danray|Dan Ray]] 22:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
* Although government is subject to all sorts of special legal provisos that the private sector doesn't have to manage, the privacy counsel at DHS, [http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/bio_1166549785058.shtm Hugo Teufel], is pretty [http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_pia_einstein2.pdf on top of his game]. If we're looking for practitioners, [http://www.arnoldporter.com/attorneys.cfm?action=view&id=380 Ron Lee] of Arnold & Porter does work with private industry.
* If we do OpenID, options for guests might include [http://www.crunchbase.com/person/bill-washburn Bill Washburn] of the OpenID Foundation and [http://blog.unto.net/ DeWitt Clinton] of Google.
* Also, since Passport has foundered, Facebook Connect looks like the hot new thing on the proprietary side. Whoever runs that for Facebook would be a natural invite as well. (see Dan's links below (?))
* And I still think the potential for the mobile phone to become the heretofore mythical convergence device and thus to become a necessary adjunct to personal identity is worth talking over.

Perhaps a bloggingheads.tv-style video conference call between someone from an electronic privacy nonprofit and a representative from Microsoft or Facebook?

:'''The Big Think team might be able help secure some of these folks -- hit me up at peter@bigthink.com if you'd like some assistance making contact. we can also help with video teleconferencing etc. [[User:PeterH|PeterH]] 07:11, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

=== Readings ===
[http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=james_grimmelmann James Grimmelmann, Facebook and The Social Dyanmics of Privacy]

[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565 Solove, Daniel J. "'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy"]

=== Links & Articles ===
http://vizedu.com/2008/12/lifestreaming-what-why-and-how/

http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/125/how-to-fix-the-web.html

http://developers.facebook.com/connect.php

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_connect_vs_open_id.php

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_connect_readies.php

http://chrissaad.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/facebook-connect-aka-hailstorm-20/

http://wiki.openid.net/Lobbying

http://planet.openid.net/

http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/facebook-google-myspace-data/

http://blog.socialmedia.com/slowly-reprogramming-the-web-for-social-networks/

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/01/technology/internet/01facebook.html?_r=1&ref=technology&pagewanted=print

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XLfbos9cVocebook-connect-is-the-future-of-digg/&feature=player_embedded

http://gigaom.com/2008/11/30/social-webs-big-question-federate-or-aggregate/

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10110382-2.html

http://www.oecd.org/LongAbstract/0,3425,en_2649_34223_40204774_119684_1_1_1,00.html

=== Concrete question(s) of the week ===

What specific privacy expectations should be articulated to the groups who control the future of OpenID?

=== Anything else material towards planning your topic ===

* Facebook + google people?
* another way to look at it is as a matter of cybercrime and such - new surveillence methods (also relevant in regards to child pornography, for example). i wander if these are too different topics or not. '''[[User:Ayelet|Ayelet]]'''
* I'd like to see a segment on what "privacy" actually means in law and in culture. This would probably attach well to any other, more applied segment. [[User:Danray|Dan Ray]] 16:38, 3 December 2008 (EST)
*Creating a series of Privacy Certification Marks

Legacy support - Revision history

Danray: New page: == Brainstorming (On earlier topic: OpenID) == === Title === OpenId and Internet Governance :: '''One of the other groups has a fun title (all together now for great justice dot org). Can...