Syllabus: Difference between revisions
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Free and Open Source Software == | == Free and Open Source Software == | ||
[[Free and Open Source Software]] | |||
'''Topic Owners: [[dulles]]''','''[[User:Ayelet|Ayelet]]''' | '''Topic Owners: [[dulles]]''','''[[User:Ayelet|Ayelet]]''' | ||
Revision as of 11:27, 8 December 2008
The Future of Copyright and Entertainment
The Future of Copyright and Entertainment
Old Laws/New Media
Topic Owners: Matt Sanchez, Debbie Rosenbaum, Shubham Mukherjee
The Internet and Publication
Free and Open Source Software
Free and Open Source Software Topic Owners: dulles,Ayelet
All Together Now For Great Justice Dot Org
Presenters: Rainer + Elana + Mchua
Precis
How to effectively design an online drive/event/project to get participation in your cause
Examples:
- Pledgebank
- Facebook Causes
- www.zoosa.org
- Citizenbase
Guest wish list
- Prof. Yochai Benkler
- Tom Steinberg
- Sean Parker and Joe Green, founders of Project Agape, the start-up that created Facebook Causes
- Joe Rospars, New Media Director, Obama for America (Elana)
- Ken Banks, FrontlineSMS (Elana)
- Sebastian Benthall, TOPP
- Joshua Gay, FSF
- Kathy Paur, ActBlue
Readings
We have three types of readings for this session:
Historical resources that come directly from our guests and their experiences.
- Guests will be asked to email the class beforehand with a short version of the kinds of things they'd say in a speech to the class, so people know who they'd want to ask for advice during the workshop portion. (Rationale: The time we're together should be spent interacting, there's always plenty of time outside of class for reading.)
- Guests will also be asked to send the class a link to their favorite resource/article on their project, or something that has informed their own work on their project.
Techniques and tools resources, mainly business books that focus on corporate use of the social web, online communities and marketing, etc. This will be pages and chapters from books like this (used as examples, not a final list):
- Marketing to the Social Web: How Digital Customer Communities Build Your Business
- Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies
- Smart Start-Ups: How Entrepreneurs and Corporations Can Profit by Starting Online Communities
Theory on activism, focusing on cyberactivism. This will consist mainly of scholarly books and papers like the following (used as examples, not a final list):
- (Paper) Technologies of Protest: Insurgent Social Movements and the First Amendment in the Era of the Internet, by the law professor Seth Kreimer. It has some pretty interesting bits -- and some funny moments -- like refrences to John McCain's staff using digital activism in 2001 during his campaign around campaign finance reform. Elana has the PDF.
- (Selection from) A Review of Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice, edited by Martha McCaughey and Michael D. Ayers.
- Philanthropy on the Commons
- Mining the wealth of networks with Yochai Benkler
- Foundations and New Media
- Netsquared
- Benkler: The Wealth of Networks
Concrete question(s) of the week
- What makes online campaigning successful? What makes online fundraising successful? What makes online activism/mobilization successful? What makes online collaboration for good causes successful?
- What actually spurs people up the ladder of engagement or into offline activism and waht does not? Which online structures, tools, networks get people how high up the ladder? Which one's should you use for which "height"? What are their individual costs?
- Is there a generalizable model here? If yes, has this model different success factors from the business world?
- What are cutting-edge examples of successful campaigning/fundraising/mobilization/collaboration? How do they harness different channels and media (www, email, SMS, etc.)?
Anything else material towards planning your topic
Session design
Our current idea for session design is structured as a workshop (and discussion afterwards). Each participant will spend the week working on a cause that they are personally interested in, applying the techniques from readings and class to their own project. Key components of this week:
- 2-3 readings will be sent out beforehand, selected from the above.
- A questionnaire will be sent out beforehand to all class participants so they can frame the most important aspects of their cause. (For instance: What are the aims of your cause? What technologies do you prefer to use while working on activism for your cause, and why? How many people do you want to mobilize? How deep should their involvement be?) Participants will use the questionnaire to write a very rough draft of a non-profit online participation project for their cause.
- The role of our guest experts will be to come in as workshop aides; it will be interesting to hear from them what they thinks the most important rules for success are. They'll get to give a short (<10min) intro speech.
- The session will kick off with a workshop where the students will work on their project. It should be an online project designed to raise and deepen involvement and/or awareness for their cause. For instance, they might contribute to the planning of a conference, create an email-blast marketing campaign, host a party that is heavily advertised online, create or spread viral media, compile statistics on online membership for their cause, etc.
- We will follow that with a debriefing to discuss how things went and the theories and best practices that apply.
Old discussion
Of course there are a lot of custom-built tools for mobilizing people online to get things done in the real world. On the other hand, what about more general tools? We've all been invited, via Facebook, to join groups and attend events (the Obama campaign certainly made good use of this); is there a generalizable model here?
Facebook groups dedicated to particular causes remind me of the online petitions that began circulating widely via email about ten years ago: their effectiveness in accomplishing real world change--and even their visibility to individuals capable of affecting the desired changes--are dubious. Is the real purpose of these movements simply to make participants feel like they are being active and involved? What percentage of those who signed email petitions in the 1990s were aware that their signatures were unverifiable and that the widely-distributed emails were unlikely to be collated and submitted to an official authority? What expectations do participants in facebook group causes have for their involvement and its consequences? The facebook group causes are certainly more centralized and visible than the old email petitions, and they provide a better tool for identifying and communicating with supporters in order to mobilize them in an organized fashion. How often is such mobilization attempted, and with what degree of success? As a tool of online activism, is facebook a step forward from chain emails, is it a step in a different direction, or does it just serve the same old functions but in newer packaging? --Gwen 08:26, 29 November 2008 (EST)
Maybe we can invite some of the leaders of the various social networking sites or Jascha Franklin-Hodge, who was an architect of the Obama campaign's use of social technology.
Might also be worth considering SMS applications that interface with the internet in this context especially since cell phones will presumably be the nexus of tech activism in the developing world. See FrontlineSMS or Ushahidi, a web crisis mapping project that let any user with a cell phone text in reports of violence in post-election Kenya as a way to geographically report real-time citizen reporting. (ELANA)
The Internet and Societal Inequity
Socio-technical Gap
Problems encountered in the act of discoursing itself are sometimes addressed via social means, technological means, or both. It has been suggested that technological tools should support social processes, but there is an adaptation of each realm to the other - how does this back-and-forth take place in the design of a successful technology-enabled discussion?
Which inequalities are created or strengthened due the increasing reliance on technology and the differences in the ability to access the Internet(e.g. global and socio-economic differences)? Does the net actually re-distribute and decentralize power and influence, or does it also reinforce the existing political and economic hierarchies? In short - is the Internet really a good thing for everybody?
- A solutions-focused question here might be: what tools might encourage a more egalitarian internet, both nationally and internationally? How can online applications be designed to encourage social equality? (Berkman Fellow Eszter Hargittai has worked on some related questions, focusing on research about how people actually use the internet.) --G 12:12, 28 November 2008 (EST)
One Laptop Per Child
Happy to help this group with info as I can. Mchua
Environmental Concerns
To what extent is the hardware upon which the Internet exists damaging the environment? Where does old tech go when it dies? What distributive impact does the "recycling" of old tech have. Was the Internet build with principles of physical sustainbility in mind? Is it too late to change? How do individual companies, like Google, view their own practices? Does the cost of a server internalize the cost of disposal? Why has it been cheaper to just keep throwing on new machines? What of the electricity necessary to run these machines? What does it say about society that we are so willing to pollute our own communities to create a second life? Has technological innovation and advancement dislocated the true impact of non-zero cost transactions? --Megerman 19:36, 29 November 2008 (EST)
Prediction Markets
Anonymity and privacy
The Future of News
Internet/network Security
Internet Governance & Regulation
Internet Governance & Regulation