Revising this guide: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Substance == | == Substance == | ||
Here are some topics under discussion, | Here are some topics under discussion. In some cases, we're still working out our recommendations. In some cases, good practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge. | ||
* How should universities assure OA for approved theses and dissertations? | |||
* How should universities respond to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates? | * How should universities respond to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates? | ||
== Procedure == | == Procedure == | ||
Revision as of 13:20, 6 October 2012
- This is a section within Good practices for university open-access policies.
Substance
Here are some topics under discussion. In some cases, we're still working out our recommendations. In some cases, good practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge.
- How should universities assure OA for approved theses and dissertations?
- How should universities respond to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates?
Procedure
- The guide is edited and written by Stuart Shieber and Peter Suber, in consultation with a growing list of experts. For the latest list, see the Preface.
- To suggest a revision, or to be listed as an endorsing organization, please contact Stuart or Peter directly.
Return to the table of contents.