Difference between revisions of "Revising this guide"

From Harvard Open Access Project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
== Substance ==
 
== Substance ==
  
Here are some topics under discussion, on which good practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge.
+
Here are some topics under discussion. In some cases, we're still working out our recommendations. In some cases, good practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge.
 +
 
 +
* How should universities assure OA for approved theses and dissertations?
  
 
* How should universities respond to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates?
 
* How should universities respond to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates?
 
* How should repositories respond to authors who ask to withdraw an article from the repository, for example, because it is mistaken, embarrassing, or superseded by a newer version?
 
  
 
== Procedure ==
 
== Procedure ==

Revision as of 17:20, 6 October 2012

Substance

Here are some topics under discussion. In some cases, we're still working out our recommendations. In some cases, good practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge.

  • How should universities assure OA for approved theses and dissertations?
  • How should universities respond to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates?

Procedure

  • To suggest a revision, or to be listed as an endorsing organization, please contact Stuart or Peter directly.



Return to the table of contents.