Revising this guide: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* To suggest a revision, or to be listed as an endorsing organization, please contact [mailto:shieber@seas.harvard.edu Stuart] or [mailto:psuber@cyber.law.harvard.edu Peter] directly. | * To suggest a revision, or to be listed as an endorsing organization, please contact [mailto:shieber@seas.harvard.edu Stuart] or [mailto:psuber@cyber.law.harvard.edu Peter] directly. | ||
---- | |||
Return to the [[Good_practices_for_university_open-access_policies|table of contents]]. | |||
Revision as of 12:36, 6 October 2012
- This is a section within Good practices for university open-access policies.
Substance
Here are some topics under discussion, on which good practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge.
- How should universities respond to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates?
- How should repositories respond to authors who ask to withdraw an article from the repository, for example, because it is mistaken, embarrassing, or superseded by a newer version?
Procedure
- The guide is edited and written by Stuart Shieber and Peter Suber, in consultation with a growing list of experts. For the latest list, see the Preface.
- To suggest a revision, or to be listed as an endorsing organization, please contact Stuart or Peter directly.
Return to the table of contents.