Difference between revisions of "Revising this guide"

From Harvard Open Access Project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
* To suggest a revision, or to be listed as an endorsing organization, please contact [mailto:shieber@seas.harvard.edu Stuart] or [mailto:psuber@cyber.law.harvard.edu Peter] directly.
 
* To suggest a revision, or to be listed as an endorsing organization, please contact [mailto:shieber@seas.harvard.edu Stuart] or [mailto:psuber@cyber.law.harvard.edu Peter] directly.
 +
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
Return to the [[Good_practices_for_university_open-access_policies|table of contents]].

Revision as of 16:36, 6 October 2012

Substance

Here are some topics under discussion, on which good practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge.

  • How should universities respond to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates?
  • How should repositories respond to authors who ask to withdraw an article from the repository, for example, because it is mistaken, embarrassing, or superseded by a newer version?

Procedure

  • To suggest a revision, or to be listed as an endorsing organization, please contact Stuart or Peter directly.



Return to the table of contents.