Revising this guide: Difference between revisions

From Harvard Open Access Project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "* This is a section within Best practices for university OA policies. {| align="right" | __TOC__ |}")
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
   | __TOC__
   | __TOC__
   |}
   |}
== Substance ==
Here some topics under discussion, on which best practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge.
* What are the best practices for responding to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates?
* What are the best practices for responding to authors who want to withdraw an article from the repository, for example, because it is mistaken, embarrassing, or superseded by a newer version?
== Procedure ==
///Here we should explain who wrote the guide, who decides what counts as a best practice (including whether to accept suggested revisions), how others may submit suggestions, and how others may join the group making editorial decisions.
///Here we should also explain how an organization may add its name to the group endorsing the guide and what that means for decisions about future revisions.

Revision as of 11:47, 6 August 2012

Substance

Here some topics under discussion, on which best practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge.

  • What are the best practices for responding to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates?
  • What are the best practices for responding to authors who want to withdraw an article from the repository, for example, because it is mistaken, embarrassing, or superseded by a newer version?

Procedure

///Here we should explain who wrote the guide, who decides what counts as a best practice (including whether to accept suggested revisions), how others may submit suggestions, and how others may join the group making editorial decisions.

///Here we should also explain how an organization may add its name to the group endorsing the guide and what that means for decisions about future revisions.