Difference between revisions of "Open Access (book)"

From Harvard Open Access Project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* The text was finished in the spring of 2011, with only one or two small updates inserted after that.  
 
* The text was finished in the spring of 2011, with only one or two small updates inserted after that.  
 
* The word count is 147k, higher than MIT wanted. In many places I was constrained by the word count. For example, in the preface, I wanted to thank many more colleagues, but in the end I only thanked those who helped with economic support for my OA work.
 
* The word count is 147k, higher than MIT wanted. In many places I was constrained by the word count. For example, in the preface, I wanted to thank many more colleagues, but in the end I only thanked those who helped with economic support for my OA work.
 +
 +
== Updates ==
 +
 +
* Elsevier boycott
 +
 +
== Second thoughts ==
 +
 +
* I call OA a "revolution" but say it's not a "radical" idea. What's not a radical step is to (1) solving severe problems harming you and your work by (2) taking advantage of existing technology.

Revision as of 08:46, 22 April 2012

  • These are Peter Suber's supplements and updates to his book, Open Access: Research Unbound, MIT Press, 2012.


The book

  • ///here give links to MIT, Amazon, etc.; explain when/how it will become OA
  • The text was finished in the spring of 2011, with only one or two small updates inserted after that.
  • The word count is 147k, higher than MIT wanted. In many places I was constrained by the word count. For example, in the preface, I wanted to thank many more colleagues, but in the end I only thanked those who helped with economic support for my OA work.

Updates

  • Elsevier boycott

Second thoughts

  • I call OA a "revolution" but say it's not a "radical" idea. What's not a radical step is to (1) solving severe problems harming you and your work by (2) taking advantage of existing technology.