OATP future: Difference between revisions

From Harvard Open Access Project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 37: Line 37:
== Searching ==
== Searching ==


* We already support boolean searching of all the tag records. One day we'll add boolean searching of the pages tagged by project tags.
* We already support boolean searching of all the tag records. One day we hope to add boolean searching of the pages tagged by project tags.


== Volunteers wanted ==
== Volunteers wanted ==

Revision as of 16:50, 13 December 2015

Harvard Open Access Project (HOAP) » Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » future

Better tagging

  • More tag convergence, including more filters to convert deprecated tags to equivalent approved tags...
  • More use of summaries or descriptions...

More tagging

  • More prospective tagging (of new developments)...
    • More people participating...
    • More people specifically looking for new developments in certain fields, countries, or languages...
  • More retroactive tagging (of older developments)...
    • More sporadic retroactive tagging, as taggers encounter relevant older items...
    • More systematic efforts to make given tags retroactively comprehensive...

Integration with OAD

  • We're working toward two sorts of integration with the Open Access Directory:
    • Retroactively tagging OAD resources with relevant OATP tags
    • Prospectively adding newly tagged OATP items to relevant OAD lists

Searching

  • We already support boolean searching of all the tag records. One day we hope to add boolean searching of the pages tagged by project tags.

Volunteers wanted

  • Scan the list of improvements we have in mind (above), and consider some of the specific jobs (below). If you're interested in helping out with any of them, please contact Peter Suber.
  • Making new project mashups
    • We need to give bloggers and webmasters more widget choices for displaying the latest items in the project feeds. We need widgets that webmasters can adapt to suit their blogs, using the titles, fonts, and color schemes of their choice.
  • Retroactive tagging
    • We need to make our consensus tags as retroactively comprehensive as possible. If you're doing a research project on an OA-related topic (for example, OA journals in Brazil), then as you find relevant items, tag them with all relevant project tags, e.g. oa.journals, oa.gold, oa.brazil, oa.south_america, oa.portuguese and so on. Just remember to omit oa.new for items more than six months old.