Solving the Dilemma of State Responses to Cyberattacks - Revision history

WikiSysop: /* Additional Notes and Highlights */

2010-08-10T18:47:01Z

Additional Notes and Highlights

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 10 August 2010
Line 119:		Line 119:

	==Additional Notes and Highlights==		==Additional Notes and Highlights==
			Expertise Required: Law - Moderate; Technology - Low

	The author is a Judge Advocate, U.S. Navy. Presently assigned as Staff Judge Advocate, Submarine		The author is a Judge Advocate, U.S. Navy. Presently assigned as Staff Judge Advocate, Submarine

Jacob: /* Categorization */

2010-07-09T16:18:42Z

Categorization

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 9 July 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	* Threats and Actors: [[States]]		* Threats and Actors: [[States]]

	* Issues: [[Cyberwar]]; [[Attribution]];[[Government to Government]]		* Issues: [[Cyberwar]]; [[Attribution]]; [[Government to Government]]

	* Approaches: [[Regulation/Liability]]; [[International Law (including Laws of War)]]; [[Deterrence]]		* Approaches: [[Regulation/Liability]]; [[International Law (including Laws of War)]]; [[Deterrence]]

Jacob: /* Key Words */

2010-07-09T16:17:19Z

Key Words

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 ==Key Words==
-Internet, International Law, active defense, threats, theory, security, criminal investigations, limitations, classification, prevention, scientists, impact, detection, theses
+[[Keyword_Index_and_Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Botnet | Botnet]],
 ==Synopsis==

Jacob: /* Categorization */

2010-07-09T16:12:13Z

Categorization

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:12, 9 July 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	==Categorization==		==Categorization==

	* Issues: [[Cyberwar]]		* Threats and Actors: [[States]]

			* Issues: [[Cyberwar]]; [[Attribution]];[[Government to Government]]

			* Approaches: [[Regulation/Liability]]; [[International Law (including Laws of War)]]; [[Deterrence]]

	==Key Words==		==Key Words==

Jacob: /* Additional Notes and Highlights */

2010-07-09T16:10:22Z

Additional Notes and Highlights

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 9 July 2010
Line 102:		Line 102:
	==Additional Notes and Highlights==		==Additional Notes and Highlights==

	~~Note :~~ Master~~'s thesis~~		The author is a Judge Advocate, U.S. Navy. Presently assigned as Staff Judge Advocate, Submarine
			Group NINE. LL.M., 2009, The Judge Advocate Gen.’s Legal Ctr. & Sch., U.S. Army,
			Charlottesville, Va.; J.D., 2002, Univ. of Tex. Sch. of Law; B.A., 1997, State Univ. of
			N.Y. at Binghamton (cum laude); A.A., 1995, State Univ. of N.Y. at Rockland. Previous
			assignments include Deputy Command Judge Advocate, U.S.S. Nimitz (CVN 68), 2006–
			2008; Command Judge Advocate, Naval Air Station, Kingsville, Tex., 2004–2006; Trial
			Counsel, Trial Service Office West, Detachment Bremerton, Wash., 2003–2004.
			Member of the bars of Texas, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
			the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and the U.S. Supreme Court. This
			article was submitted in partial completion of the Master of Laws requirements of the
			57th Judge Advocate Officer Graduate Course.

Jacob: /* Synopsis */

2010-07-09T16:08:24Z

Synopsis

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 ==Synopsis==
-The greatest advances in law, like those in science, come through imagination. When scientific knowledge fails to explain new discoveries about the universe, scientists advance new theories to account for their discoveries' so too with the law. Revolutions in technology, like the Internet, challenge the framework that regulates international armed conflict. Legal scholars must use imagination to find ways to tackle this problem. If not, the law will become obsolete and meaningless to the states that need its guidance. Man has long sought to regulate warfare. From the Chivalric Code to the U.N. Charter, man has placed restraints on the times one can resort to war and the methods with which it is conducted. There are a variety of reasons why, but, to generalize, regulations are the response to perceived problems with the state of war at a given time. Sometimes these perceptions are the result of shifts in the social conscience. At other times, values haven't changed at all, but problems arise due to radical changes in the way war is waged. As warfare changes, so must the law; and warfare is changing fast. Traditionally, the instruments of war were only controlled by states. However, in today's world of globally interconnected computer systems, non-state actors with a laptop computer and an Internet connection can attack the critical infrastructure of another state from across the world. This is a major paradigm shift, which the law of war, today, fails to adequately address. This paper will explore the unique challenges that cyberattacks pose to the law of war and provide an analytical framework for dealing with them.
+'''ABSTRACT'''
 ==Additional Notes and Highlights==
 Note : Master's thesis

Jacob: /* Full Citation */

2010-07-09T15:14:07Z

Full Citation

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 9 July 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==Full Citation==		==Full Citation==

	Matthew J. Sklerov, ''Solving the Dilemma of State Responses to Cyberattacks: A Justification for the use of Active Defenses Against States Who Neglect Their Duty to Prevent,'' 201 Mil. L. Rev. ~~201~~ (2009). [http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/Military_Law_Review/pdf-files/201-fall-2009.pdf ''Web'']		Matthew J. Sklerov, ''Solving the Dilemma of State Responses to Cyberattacks: A Justification for the use of Active Defenses Against States Who Neglect Their Duty to Prevent,'' 201 Mil. L. Rev. 1 (2009). [http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/Military_Law_Review/pdf-files/201-fall-2009.pdf ''Web'']

	[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/?title=Special:Bibliography&view=detailed&startkey=Sklerov_MJ:2009&f=wikibiblio.bib BibTeX]		[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/?title=Special:Bibliography&view=detailed&startkey=Sklerov_MJ:2009&f=wikibiblio.bib BibTeX]

Jacob: /* Full Citation */

2010-07-09T15:13:36Z

Full Citation

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 9 July 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==Full Citation==		==Full Citation==

	Matthew J. Sklerov, ''Solving the Dilemma of State Responses to Cyberattacks: A Justification for the use of Active Defenses Against States Who Neglect Their Duty to Prevent,'' 201 Mil. L. Rev. 201 (2009). [http://~~handle~~.~~dtic~~.~~mil~~/~~100~~.~~2/ADA517821~~ ''Web'']		Matthew J. Sklerov, ''Solving the Dilemma of State Responses to Cyberattacks: A Justification for the use of Active Defenses Against States Who Neglect Their Duty to Prevent,'' 201 Mil. L. Rev. 201 (2009). [http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/Military_Law_Review/pdf-files/201-fall-2009.pdf ''Web'']

	[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/?title=Special:Bibliography&view=detailed&startkey=Sklerov_MJ:2009&f=wikibiblio.bib BibTeX]		[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/?title=Special:Bibliography&view=detailed&startkey=Sklerov_MJ:2009&f=wikibiblio.bib BibTeX]

WikiSysop at 21:29, 22 June 2010

2010-06-22T21:29:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 22 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Solving the Dilemma of State Responses to Cyberattacks: A Justification for the use of Active Defenses Against States Who Neglect Their Duty to Prevent==		==Full Title of Reference==
			Solving the Dilemma of State Responses to Cyberattacks: A Justification for the use of Active Defenses Against States Who Neglect Their Duty to Prevent

	==Full Citation==		==Full Citation==

WikiSysop at 14:08, 27 May 2010

2010-05-27T14:08:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 27 May 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Categorization==		==Categorization==

	* Issues: [[~~Laws of War/~~Cyberwar]]		* Issues: [[Cyberwar]]

	==Key Words==		==Key Words==