Difference between revisions of "Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained"

From Cybersecurity Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ==Full Title of Reference== Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained ==Full Citation== Daniel E. Geer Jr. and Daniel G. Conway ''Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained.'' IEEE Security & Privacy (201...)
 
 
Line 18: Line 18:
 
==Key Words==  
 
==Key Words==  
  
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Research_.26_Development], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Risk_Modeling]
+
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Research_.26_Development Research and Development], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Risk_Modeling Risk Modeling]
  
 
==Synopsis==
 
==Synopsis==

Latest revision as of 16:03, 17 June 2010

Full Title of Reference

Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained

Full Citation

Daniel E. Geer Jr. and Daniel G. Conway Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained. IEEE Security & Privacy (2010), Vol. 8, No. 2, pp 86-87. Purchase

BibTeX

Categorization

Approaches: Industry Reports

Issues: Economics of Cybersecurity; Risk Management and Investment; Incentives

Key Words

Research and Development, Risk Modeling

Synopsis

Investors at all levels are pulling back from cybersecurity, which has serious consequences if and only if investment in cybersecurity matters. If it does, then trouble is brewing. If it does not, then radically different tactics are called for. Definitive numbers are scarce, but indicative numbers are self-evident.

Additional Notes and Highlights