Difference between revisions of "Four Grand Challenges in Trustworthy Computing"

From Cybersecurity Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
Computing Research Assoc. ''Four Grand Challenges in Trustworthy Computing: Second in a Series of Conferences on Grand Research Challenges in Computer Science and Engineering'' (2003). [http://www.cyber.st.dhs.gov/docs/CRA%20Grand%20Challenges%202003.pdf  ''Web'']
 
Computing Research Assoc. ''Four Grand Challenges in Trustworthy Computing: Second in a Series of Conferences on Grand Research Challenges in Computer Science and Engineering'' (2003). [http://www.cyber.st.dhs.gov/docs/CRA%20Grand%20Challenges%202003.pdf  ''Web'']
  
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/?title=Special:Bibliography&view=detailed&startkey=CRA:2003&f=wikibiblio.bib BibTeX]
+
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Special:Bibliography?f=wikibiblio.bib&title=Special:Bibliography&view=detailed&action=&keyword=CRA:2003 ''BibTeX'']
 
 
  
 
==Categorization==
 
==Categorization==
  
Overview: [[Government Reports]]
+
* Overview: [[Government Reports]]
  
 
==Key Words==  
 
==Key Words==  
Line 26: Line 25:
 
because they threaten to constrict the pipeline of fundamental cyber security research that. . .is vital to
 
because they threaten to constrict the pipeline of fundamental cyber security research that. . .is vital to
 
securing the Nation’s IT infrastructure.”
 
securing the Nation’s IT infrastructure.”
 
  
 
==Additional Notes and Highlights==
 
==Additional Notes and Highlights==

Revision as of 14:50, 24 June 2010

Full Title of Reference

Four Grand Challenges in Trustworthy Computing: Second in a Series of Conferences on Grand Research Challenges in Computer Science and Engineering

Full Citation

Computing Research Assoc. Four Grand Challenges in Trustworthy Computing: Second in a Series of Conferences on Grand Research Challenges in Computer Science and Engineering (2003). Web

BibTeX

Categorization

Key Words

Synopsis

The goal of the CRA Grand Research Challenges conferences is to encourage thinking beyond incremental improvements. Some important problems simply cannot be solved by narrow investigation aimed at short-term payoffs. Multiple approaches, carried out over a long period of time, will be required. The community is, in effect, looking for big advances that require vision and cannot be achieved by small evolutionary steps. The February 2005 report by the President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC) supported a long-term view of research by agencies such as DARPA and NSA, arguing that the trends “favoring short-term research over long-term research. . . should concern policymakers because they threaten to constrict the pipeline of fundamental cyber security research that. . .is vital to securing the Nation’s IT infrastructure.”

Additional Notes and Highlights