Difference between revisions of "Cyber-Apocalypse Now"

From Cybersecurity Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
Issues: [[Public Critical Infrastructure]], [[Terrorists]], [[Private Critical Infrastructure]], [[International Law (including Laws of War)]], [[Security Components of Classic Cyberissues (e.g. IP)]]
Issues: [[International Law (including Laws of War)]]; [[Private Critical Infrastructure]]; [[Public Critical Infrastructure]]; [[Security Components of Classic Cyberissues (e.g. IP)]]; [[Terrorists]]
==Key Words==  
==Key Words==  
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Cyber_Terrorism Cyber Terrorism]
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Cyber_Terrorism Cyber Terrorism],
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Laws_of_War Laws of War]
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Laws_of_War Laws of War],
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#State_Affiliation State Affiliation]
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#State_Affiliation State Affiliation]

Revision as of 14:53, 17 June 2010

Full Title of Reference

Cyber-Apocalypse Now - Securing the Internet Against Cyberterrorism and Using Universal Jurisdiction as a Deterrent

Full Citation

Kelly A. Gable, Cyber-Apocalypse Now - Securing the Internet Against Cyberterrorism and Using Universal Jurisdiction as a Deterrent, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 43, No. 1 (2010). SSRN



Issues: International Law (including Laws of War); Private Critical Infrastructure; Public Critical Infrastructure; Security Components of Classic Cyberissues (e.g. IP); Terrorists

Key Words

Cyber Terrorism, Laws of War, State Affiliation


Cyberterrorism has become one of the most significant threats to the national and international security of the modern state, and cyberattacks are occurring with increased frequency. The Internet not only makes it easier for terrorists to communicate, organize terrorist cells, share information, plan attacks, and recruit others but also is in- creasingly being used to commit cyberterrorist acts. It is clear that the international community may only ignore cyberterrorism at its peril.

The primary security threat posed by the Internet is caused by an inherent weakness in the TCP/IP Protocol, which is the technology underlying the structure of the Internet and other similar networks. This underlying struc- ture enables cyberterrorists to hack into one system and use it as a springboard for jumping onto any other network that is also based on the TCP/IP Protocol. Other threats to national and international security include direct at- tacks on the Internet and the use of the Internet as a free source of hacking tools. These threats will not be eradic- ated easily.

In the absence of feasible prevention, deterrence of cyberterrorism may be the best alternative. Without, at a minimum, a concerted effort at deterrence, cyberterrorism will continue to threaten national and international se- curity. The most feasible way to deter cyberterrorists is tuniversal jurisdiction.

Additional Notes and Highlights