Cyber-Apocalypse Now: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Laws_of_War Laws of War], | [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Laws_of_War Laws of War], | ||
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#State_Affiliation State Affiliation] | [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#State_Affiliation State Affiliation] | ||
==Synopsis== | ==Synopsis== | ||
Cyberterrorism has become one of the most significant threats to the national and international security of the | Cyberterrorism has become one of the most significant threats to the national and international security of the modern state, and cyberattacks are occurring with increased frequency. The Internet not only makes it easier for terrorists to communicate, organize terrorist cells, share information, plan attacks, and recruit others but also is increasingly being used to commit cyberterrorist acts. It is clear that the international community may only ignore cyberterrorism at its peril. | ||
modern state, and cyberattacks are occurring with increased frequency. The Internet not only makes it easier for | |||
terrorists to communicate, organize terrorist cells, share information, plan attacks, and recruit others but also is | |||
cyberterrorism at its peril | |||
The primary security threat posed by the Internet is caused by an inherent weakness in the TCP/IP Protocol, which is the technology underlying the structure of the Internet and other similar networks. This underlying structure enables cyberterrorists to hack into one system and use it as a springboard for jumping onto any other network that is also based on the TCP/IP Protocol. Other threats to national and international security include direct attacks on the Internet and the use of the Internet as a free source of hacking tools. These threats will not be eradicated easily. | |||
In the absence of feasible prevention, deterrence of cyberterrorism may be the best alternative. Without, at a minimum, a concerted effort at deterrence, cyberterrorism will continue to threaten national and international security. The most feasible way to deter cyberterrorists is tuniversal jurisdiction. | |||
==Additional Notes and Highlights== | ==Additional Notes and Highlights== | ||
Latest revision as of 09:54, 17 June 2010
Full Title of Reference
Cyber-Apocalypse Now - Securing the Internet Against Cyberterrorism and Using Universal Jurisdiction as a Deterrent
Full Citation
Kelly A. Gable, Cyber-Apocalypse Now - Securing the Internet Against Cyberterrorism and Using Universal Jurisdiction as a Deterrent, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 43, No. 1 (2010). SSRN
Categorization
Issues: International Law (including Laws of War); Private Critical Infrastructure; Public Critical Infrastructure; Security Components of Classic Cyberissues (e.g. IP); Terrorists
Key Words
Cyber Terrorism, Laws of War, State Affiliation
Synopsis
Cyberterrorism has become one of the most significant threats to the national and international security of the modern state, and cyberattacks are occurring with increased frequency. The Internet not only makes it easier for terrorists to communicate, organize terrorist cells, share information, plan attacks, and recruit others but also is increasingly being used to commit cyberterrorist acts. It is clear that the international community may only ignore cyberterrorism at its peril.
The primary security threat posed by the Internet is caused by an inherent weakness in the TCP/IP Protocol, which is the technology underlying the structure of the Internet and other similar networks. This underlying structure enables cyberterrorists to hack into one system and use it as a springboard for jumping onto any other network that is also based on the TCP/IP Protocol. Other threats to national and international security include direct attacks on the Internet and the use of the Internet as a free source of hacking tools. These threats will not be eradicated easily.
In the absence of feasible prevention, deterrence of cyberterrorism may be the best alternative. Without, at a minimum, a concerted effort at deterrence, cyberterrorism will continue to threaten national and international security. The most feasible way to deter cyberterrorists is tuniversal jurisdiction.