Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ==Full Title of Reference== Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained ==Full Citation== Daniel E. Geer Jr. and Daniel G. Conway ''Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained.'' IEEE Security & Privacy (201...) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Key Words== | ==Key Words== | ||
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Research_.26_Development], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Risk_Modeling] | [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Research_.26_Development Research and Development], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Glossary_of_Core_Ideas#Risk_Modeling Risk Modeling] | ||
==Synopsis== | ==Synopsis== |
Latest revision as of 11:03, 17 June 2010
Full Title of Reference
Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained
Full Citation
Daniel E. Geer Jr. and Daniel G. Conway Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained. IEEE Security & Privacy (2010), Vol. 8, No. 2, pp 86-87. Purchase
Categorization
Approaches: Industry Reports
Issues: Economics of Cybersecurity; Risk Management and Investment; Incentives
Key Words
Research and Development, Risk Modeling
Synopsis
Investors at all levels are pulling back from cybersecurity, which has serious consequences if and only if investment in cybersecurity matters. If it does, then trouble is brewing. If it does not, then radically different tactics are called for. Definitive numbers are scarce, but indicative numbers are self-evident.