Computer Network Attack and the Use of Force in International Law: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Full Citation== | ==Full Citation== | ||
Michael N. Schmitt, ''Computer Network Attack and the Use of Force in International Law. Thoughts on a Normative Framework.,'' 37 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 885 (1999). [http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA471993&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf ''Web''] [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1603800 ''SSRN''] | Michael N. Schmitt, ''Computer Network Attack and the Use of Force in International Law. Thoughts on a Normative Framework.,'' 37 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 885 (1999). [http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA471993&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf ''Web''] [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1603800 ''SSRN''] | ||
Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
==Categorization== | ==Categorization== | ||
Issues: [[Laws of War/Cyberwar]] | * Issues: [[Laws of War/Cyberwar]] | ||
==Key Words== | ==Key Words== | ||
Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
This article explores the acceptability under the 'jus ad bellum', that body of international law governing the 'resort to force' as an instrument of national policy of computer network attack. Analysis centers on the United Nations Charter's prohibition of the use of force in Article 2(4), its Chapter VII security scheme, and the inherent right to self-defense codified in Article 51. Concluding that traditional applications of the use of force prohibition fail to adequately safeguard shared community values threatened by CNA, the Article proposes an alternative normative framework based on scrutiny of the consequences caused by such operations. | This article explores the acceptability under the 'jus ad bellum', that body of international law governing the 'resort to force' as an instrument of national policy of computer network attack. Analysis centers on the United Nations Charter's prohibition of the use of force in Article 2(4), its Chapter VII security scheme, and the inherent right to self-defense codified in Article 51. Concluding that traditional applications of the use of force prohibition fail to adequately safeguard shared community values threatened by CNA, the Article proposes an alternative normative framework based on scrutiny of the consequences caused by such operations. | ||
==Additional Notes and Highlights== | ==Additional Notes and Highlights== | ||
Revision as of 16:33, 21 May 2010
Computer Network Attack and the Use of Force in International Law: Thoughts on a Normative Framework
Full Citation
Michael N. Schmitt, Computer Network Attack and the Use of Force in International Law. Thoughts on a Normative Framework., 37 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 885 (1999). Web SSRN
Categorization
- Issues: Laws of War/Cyberwar
Key Words
computer, network, cyber, jus an bellum, use of force, international law, self-defense, self-defence, collective security
Synopsis
This article explores the acceptability under the 'jus ad bellum', that body of international law governing the 'resort to force' as an instrument of national policy of computer network attack. Analysis centers on the United Nations Charter's prohibition of the use of force in Article 2(4), its Chapter VII security scheme, and the inherent right to self-defense codified in Article 51. Concluding that traditional applications of the use of force prohibition fail to adequately safeguard shared community values threatened by CNA, the Article proposes an alternative normative framework based on scrutiny of the consequences caused by such operations.