Thoughts on Political Blogs

From CyberOne Wiki
Revision as of 16:30, 8 October 2006 by <bdi>Demqf</bdi> (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • It seems that America has become very deeply divided along partisan lines in the last 5 years. How has the existence of political blogs contributed to this phenomenon?
  • If you think the partisan divide is a bad thing, how might blogs be used to ameliorate the problem?
  • Does the rise of political blogging as a tool of the masses present an opportunity that has never before existed in America to have a viable third party?
  • Assuming internet censorship is imperfect, how might political blogs contribute to the demise of authoritarianism?
  • Does widespread authorship and readership of political blogs (uncontrolled by the regular media giants) represent a true "marketplace of ideas"? What effect might that have on American-style democracy?
"I think that blogging should die a sudden death. It's just ridiculous. It's like a playground for four-year-olds. People say and do things in the world of blogs that they would never do in real life, and I think it's a false experience. You know, it's, like, eating too much candy. One of the things along those lines that bothers me about when people start citing blogs as news sources is that when people are writing on these blogs, they feel like they don't feel they need to do any research or back up their opinions with facts or anything, you know what I mean? Times have changed. It used to be, to be a writer you had to have experience and talent, and learn a craft. Now anybody with an opinion, which is anyone and everyone, feels that it's worthy. Technology is allowing people to have access to things where before it required very great skill. So there will be some interesting developments from that, and also some things that are pretty worthless. Pretty soon anybody with a cell phone is going to be able to be a news reporter. The blog is yesterday's parachute pants. It's here now but it's gone tomorrow."
  • However incoherent this rant may be, does he have a point?
  • Are blogs just a fad? What might cause their demise?
  • Perhaps copyright or libel issues?
  • Loss of "buzz?"
  • Usurpation of the space by another technology?
  • If blogs are not just a fad, how will they evolve over time? Will it be a different evolution than that of the regular news media?
  • Do consumers assume bloggers are more or less truthful than the regular news media? Is that a problem? What might be the value in that? Consider the arguments that most major media outlets have a distinct partisan bias.
  • Are blogs only valuable for the opinions of the bloggers, or are they also a valid source of factual news?
  • Is it good or bad that everybody with an opinion can make it heard? What might be the effects on politics, culture, religion etc?
  • Is it a problem that many bloggers have not "learned a craft" in journalism school or by working up the ranks in a regular news agency? Might there be benefits to giving such people a voice?
  • Is it good or bad that the traditional sources of news and opinion concerning politics now have competition in the form of blogs? Why?