PrivacyAnonymity - Revision history

BerkmanSysop: UTurn to 1267401600

2024-08-14T19:58:18Z

UTurn to 1267401600

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 14 August 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Consider whether consumers on the internet truly make informed decisions regarding their privacy. The Terms of Use of Facebook for example - have you ever really read them all the way through? What about Harvard Law School's privacy terms for our email or administrative boards? Does the average user read and understand those terms? Some technological projects like the [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Drumbeat/Challenges/Privacy_Icons Drumbeat Privacy Icons] project are working on new ways to inform users about the privacy regulations of the sites they visit. (Drumbeat is looking for proposals on how to develop a system of "privacy icons" that could easily label websites according to the degree of privacy retained by the user.) And there are also technological businesses and solutions such as [http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=reputationdefender&aq=0&aqi=g1g-s4g1g-s1&oq=reputationd&fp=a50ffc77dda4c0bc ReputationDefender], but are these enough to address the issue?		Consider whether consumers on the internet truly make informed decisions regarding their privacy. The Terms of Use of Facebook for example - have you ever really read them all the way through? What about Harvard Law School's privacy terms for our email or administrative boards? Does the average user read and understand those terms? Some technological projects like the [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Drumbeat/Challenges/Privacy_Icons Drumbeat Privacy Icons] project are working on new ways to inform users about the privacy regulations of the sites they visit. (Drumbeat is looking for proposals on how to develop a system of "privacy icons" that could easily label websites according to the degree of privacy retained by the user.) And there are also technological businesses and solutions such as [http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=reputationdefender&aq=0&aqi=g1g-s4g1g-s1&oq=reputationd&fp=a50ffc77dda4c0bc ReputationDefender], but are these enough to address the issue?

	Unlike snail mail, your email can be readily surveilled by government officials without a warrant because courts have held that there is no expectation of privacy on the internet. ~~[https://goo.gl/aPTK9s Paykasa]~~		Unlike snail mail, your email can be readily surveilled by government officials without a warrant because courts have held that there is no expectation of privacy on the internet.

	Is this true?		Is this true?

212.252.81.140 at 09:54, 29 February 2016

2016-02-29T09:54:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:54, 29 February 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Consider whether consumers on the internet truly make informed decisions regarding their privacy. The Terms of Use of Facebook for example - have you ever really read them all the way through? What about Harvard Law School's privacy terms for our email or administrative boards? Does the average user read and understand those terms? Some technological projects like the [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Drumbeat/Challenges/Privacy_Icons Drumbeat Privacy Icons] project are working on new ways to inform users about the privacy regulations of the sites they visit. (Drumbeat is looking for proposals on how to develop a system of "privacy icons" that could easily label websites according to the degree of privacy retained by the user.) And there are also technological businesses and solutions such as [http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=reputationdefender&aq=0&aqi=g1g-s4g1g-s1&oq=reputationd&fp=a50ffc77dda4c0bc ReputationDefender], but are these enough to address the issue?		Consider whether consumers on the internet truly make informed decisions regarding their privacy. The Terms of Use of Facebook for example - have you ever really read them all the way through? What about Harvard Law School's privacy terms for our email or administrative boards? Does the average user read and understand those terms? Some technological projects like the [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Drumbeat/Challenges/Privacy_Icons Drumbeat Privacy Icons] project are working on new ways to inform users about the privacy regulations of the sites they visit. (Drumbeat is looking for proposals on how to develop a system of "privacy icons" that could easily label websites according to the degree of privacy retained by the user.) And there are also technological businesses and solutions such as [http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=reputationdefender&aq=0&aqi=g1g-s4g1g-s1&oq=reputationd&fp=a50ffc77dda4c0bc ReputationDefender], but are these enough to address the issue?

	Unlike snail mail, your email can be readily surveilled by government officials without a warrant because courts have held that there is no expectation of privacy on the internet.		Unlike snail mail, your email can be readily surveilled by government officials without a warrant because courts have held that there is no expectation of privacy on the internet. [https://goo.gl/aPTK9s Paykasa]

	Is this true?		Is this true?

Spider at 09:29, 2 December 2009

2009-12-02T09:29:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:29, 2 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Consider~~ privacy ~~- how much~~ privacy ~~do we really have~~ and ~~how do we inform~~		On the internet, it can be tempting to view yourself as an anonymous browser, but increasingly the public is becoming aware of just how untrue that is. A study by the [http://epic.org/reports/surfer-beware.html Electronic Privacy Information Center] surveyed the 100 most frequently visited sites on the internet; of those 100 none met the basic privacy standards established by EPIC and only 17 had any privacy terms at all. In a medium with so little protection and so much information available, [http://nymag.com/news/features/27341/ children] are particularly vulnerable.

	~~Are we making~~ informed decisions~~? Consider the~~ Terms of Use of Facebook - have you ever really read through ~~those privacy issues~~? What about Harvard Law School's privacy terms for our email or administrative boards? Does the average user read and understand those terms? Some technological projects like the [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Drumbeat/Challenges/Privacy_Icons Drumbeat Privacy Icons] project are working on new ways to inform users about the privacy regulations of the sites they visit. (Drumbeat is looking for proposals on how to develop a system of "privacy icons" that could easily label websites according to the degree of privacy retained by the user.)		Consider whether consumers on the internet truly make informed decisions regarding their privacy. The Terms of Use of Facebook for example - have you ever really read them all the way through? What about Harvard Law School's privacy terms for our email or administrative boards? Does the average user read and understand those terms? Some technological projects like the [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Drumbeat/Challenges/Privacy_Icons Drumbeat Privacy Icons] project are working on new ways to inform users about the privacy regulations of the sites they visit. (Drumbeat is looking for proposals on how to develop a system of "privacy icons" that could easily label websites according to the degree of privacy retained by the user.) And there are also technological businesses and solutions such as [http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=reputationdefender&aq=0&aqi=g1g-s4g1g-s1&oq=reputationd&fp=a50ffc77dda4c0bc ReputationDefender], but are these enough to address the issue?

	~~Technological businesses and solutions such as[http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=reputationdefender&aq=0&aqi=g1g-s4g1g-s1&oq=reputationd&fp=a50ffc77dda4c0bc ReputationDefender] also affect~~ the ~~issue~~.		Unlike snail mail, your email can be readily surveilled by government officials without a warrant because courts have held that there is no expectation of privacy on the internet.

	~~Also consider how anonymity is a double-edged sword: it can protect privacy but it raises a whole host of problems regarding attribution and authorship.~~		Is this true?

Spider: New page: Consider privacy - how much privacy do we really have and how do we inform Are we making informed decisions? Consider the Terms of Use of Facebook - have you ever really read through tho...

2009-11-19T19:56:10Z

New page: Consider privacy - how much privacy do we really have and how do we inform Are we making informed decisions? Consider the Terms of Use of Facebook - have you ever really read through tho...

New page

Consider privacy - how much privacy do we really have and how do we inform

Are we making informed decisions? Consider the Terms of Use of Facebook - have you ever really read through those privacy issues? What about Harvard Law School's privacy terms for our email or administrative boards? Does the average user read and understand those terms? Some technological projects like the [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Drumbeat/Challenges/Privacy_Icons Drumbeat Privacy Icons] project are working on new ways to inform users about the privacy regulations of the sites they visit. (Drumbeat is looking for proposals on how to develop a system of "privacy icons" that could easily label websites according to the degree of privacy retained by the user.)

Technological businesses and solutions such as[http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=reputationdefender&aq=0&aqi=g1g-s4g1g-s1&oq=reputationd&fp=a50ffc77dda4c0bc ReputationDefender] also affect the issue.

Also consider how anonymity is a double-edged sword: it can protect privacy but it raises a whole host of problems regarding attribution and authorship.