Presentation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Brunomagrani (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:(1) highlighting incorrect information and creating an accessible database issues; | :(1) highlighting incorrect information and creating an accessible database issues; | ||
:(2) reaching out to readers of Wikipedia and drawing them into the Wikipedia editor community. | :(2) reaching out to readers of Wikipedia and drawing them into the Wikipedia editor community. | ||
:(3) Launch a campaign to increase Wikipedia's user base: Donate edits to Wikipedia. | |||
[Amanda] | [Amanda] | ||
Line 36: | Line 37: | ||
Once the user highlighted, | Once the user highlighted, | ||
application plug-in will highlight content that the user believes is incorrect | application plug-in will highlight content that the user believes is incorrect | ||
sits as an icon on the user's browser toolbar | sits as an icon on the user's browser toolbar | ||
when a user reads content they feel is incorrect on Wikipedia, they can open the application | when a user reads content they feel is incorrect on Wikipedia, they can open the application | ||
- what demographic are we reaching out to? how will we reach that demographic? | - what demographic are we reaching out to? how will we reach that demographic? | ||
- tap into | - tap into | ||
- utilizing crowdsourcing techniques to highlight disputed content | - utilizing crowdsourcing techniques to highlight disputed content | ||
- strengthening relationship to secondary school system | - strengthening relationship to secondary school system | ||
Revision as of 18:54, 17 January 2010
Hello - we are Amanda, Bruno, Franny, Hector and Yosuke of the Cyberlaw: Difficult Problems course. Feedback from people who use and are familiar with Wikipedia/Wikimedia is an extremely important part of formulating our proposed solution, and we thank you for your interest and contributions. We only ask that you direct your comments and input to the other Future of Wikipedia pages, and allow us to use this Presentation page to create our final class presentation. We look forward to hearing from you!
Introduction
- overview of problems considered (e.g. governance, community, etc.)
- - participation and interest phenomenon
Selected Key Problems to Address
- quality of content
- decreasing editor base
- outreach and public relations
Different Perspectives on the Key Problems
- Bridgespan
- Wikimedia
- Wikipedia Review
- general public (Mechanical Turk responses) [INSERT EXCEL RESULTS]
Proposed Solution
Create an application plug in for the purposes of:
- (1) highlighting incorrect information and creating an accessible database issues;
- (2) reaching out to readers of Wikipedia and drawing them into the Wikipedia editor community.
- (3) Launch a campaign to increase Wikipedia's user base: Donate edits to Wikipedia.
[Amanda] We envision an application plug-in that sits as an icon on the user's browser toolbar. When the user comes across an article they believe to be incorrect, they can open the icon into a simple horizontal toolbar across the bottom of the page.
[INSERT PICTURE]
Once the user highlighted,
application plug-in will highlight content that the user believes is incorrect sits as an icon on the user's browser toolbar when a user reads content they feel is incorrect on Wikipedia, they can open the application
- what demographic are we reaching out to? how will we reach that demographic? - tap into - utilizing crowdsourcing techniques to highlight disputed content - strengthening relationship to secondary school system
Analysis
- must reach user base outside Wikipedia-cosm
-
Implementation
1. Name application 2. Reach out to Mozilla community to build proposed FireFox application extension. 3. Work with Wikimedia/Bridgespan to incorporate
Future Steps
- filtering/sorting a landing page -see Community Portal (Help Us Out) - plug in landing page to something similar to Aardvark - integration with banner and other - lesson plan proposal -