Day 8 Predictions: Difference between revisions

From Cyberlaw: Difficult Issues Winter 2010
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: I believe due process is needed for the protection of the party against which actions to be taken, and in the interest of public notice. According to Facebook terms of service, an account ...)
 
(Removing all content from page)
Line 1: Line 1:
I believe due process is needed for the protection of the party against which actions to be taken, and in the interest of public notice. According to Facebook terms of service, an account will be disabled if it is found to repeatedly infringe other people's intellectual property rights. I think here a due process is needed to disable an account on Facebook. How many times does "repeatedly" refer to? Who have the final say on this "infringement" of other people's intellectual property rights? I want to hear more from our guest on their practice to deal with this, and how they balance between the alleged owner of the right and the one against whom the action to be taken.
 

Revision as of 17:01, 13 January 2010

Retrieved from "http://cyber.harvard.edu/cyberlaw_winter10/?title=Day_8_Predictions&oldid=699"