Ubicomp Brainstorming: Difference between revisions

From Cyberlaw: Difficult Issues Winter 2010
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==CONCERNS==
== Taxonomy ==


Participants
== Best Practices ==
:Surveillance / control
:Alienation
::People are not connected to the world
::People are not connected to the purpose of the job
: Moral valence
: Addiction -- Farmville (and virtual currency)
:: Reputation portability -- no incentives for superrogatory behavior
:Personally bearing high risk
   
“Employer”
: Disclosure
: Reputation
   
Platforms
: Spam free
: How much liability should they bear
Systemic concerns:
:Motivation (kill time, fun, make a living)
: Disclosure
: Race to the bottom
: Exploitation of workers
:: Standard labor law
:: Profit mainly away
:: Child labor
:Addiction
:How to keep the work from hurting people / the internet
:Demographics
:In house employees losing jobs (but counterbalanced by more innovation?)
: Low quality of work
:What about when governments do this?


== Technologies ==
==SOLUTIONS==
 
:Taxonomy
== The Worker-Owned Platform ==
:FTC: Full disclosure (for content providers) of paid opinions
:Safe harbor – notice and takedown
:Best practices - focused at who?
:Crowd-owned platforms
:Technological/plugins
::"Real Name" analogue "Real Purpose" for disclosure
:: Categorize employers
: Volunteer filtering
:Social tools (live chat etc.) for alienation
:Platform interoperability for reputation portability
:Plugins like Turkopticon for reviews of tasks

Latest revision as of 13:15, 15 January 2010

Taxonomy

Best Practices

Technologies

The Worker-Owned Platform

Retrieved from "http://cyber.harvard.edu/cyberlaw_winter10/?title=Ubicomp_Brainstorming&oldid=821"