Ubicomp Brainstorming: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Problems to Tackle= | |||
==CONCERNS== | |||
Participants: | |||
· Surveillance / control | |||
· Alienation | |||
o People are not connected to the world | |||
o People are not connected to the purpose of the job | |||
· Moral valence | |||
· Addiction -- Farmville (and virtual currency) | |||
· Reputation portability -- no incentives for superrogatory behavior | |||
Personally bearing high risk | |||
âEmployerâ | |||
· Disclosure | |||
· Reputation | |||
Platforms | |||
· Spam free | |||
· How much liability should they bear | |||
Systemic concerns: | |||
· Motivation (kill time, fun, make a living) | |||
· Disclosure | |||
· Race to the bottom | |||
· Exploitation of workers | |||
o Standard labor law | |||
o Profit mainly away | |||
o Child labor | |||
Addiction | |||
· How to keep the work from hurting people / the internet | |||
· Demographics | |||
- In house employees losing jobs (but counterbalanced by more innovation?) | |||
- Low quality of work | |||
-What about when governments do this? | |||
:: Demographics | :: Demographics | ||
::In house employees losing jobs (but counterbalanced by more innovation?) | ::In house employees losing jobs (but counterbalanced by more innovation?) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 42: | ||
==SOLUTIONS== | |||
Taxonomy | :Taxonomy | ||
FTC: Full disclosure (for content providers) of paid opinions | :FTC: Full disclosure (for content providers) of paid opinions | ||
Safe harbor â notice and takedown | :Safe harbor â notice and takedown | ||
Best practices - focused at who? | :Best practices - focused at who? | ||
Crowd-owned platforms | :Crowd-owned platforms | ||
Technological/plugins | :Technological/plugins | ||
::"Real Name" analogue "Real Purpose" for disclosure | |||
:: Categorize employers | |||
: Volunteer filtering | |||
:Social tools (live chat etc.) for alienation | |||
:Platform interoperability for reputation portability | |||
:Plugins like Turkopticon for reviews of tasks | |||
Revision as of 17:48, 14 January 2010
Problems to Tackle
CONCERNS
Participants: · Surveillance / control · Alienation o People are not connected to the world o People are not connected to the purpose of the job · Moral valence · Addiction -- Farmville (and virtual currency) · Reputation portability -- no incentives for superrogatory behavior Personally bearing high risk
âEmployerâ · Disclosure · Reputation
Platforms · Spam free · How much liability should they bear
Systemic concerns: · Motivation (kill time, fun, make a living) · Disclosure · Race to the bottom · Exploitation of workers o Standard labor law o Profit mainly away o Child labor Addiction · How to keep the work from hurting people / the internet · Demographics - In house employees losing jobs (but counterbalanced by more innovation?) - Low quality of work -What about when governments do this?
- Demographics
- In house employees losing jobs (but counterbalanced by more innovation?)
- Low quality of work
- What about when governments do this?
SOLUTIONS
- Taxonomy
- FTC: Full disclosure (for content providers) of paid opinions
- Safe harbor â notice and takedown
- Best practices - focused at who?
- Crowd-owned platforms
- Technological/plugins
::"Real Name" analogue "Real Purpose" for disclosure
- Categorize employers
- Volunteer filtering
- Social tools (live chat etc.) for alienation
- Platform interoperability for reputation portability
- Plugins like Turkopticon for reviews of tasks