Day 3 Thoughts: Difference between revisions

From Cyberlaw: Difficult Issues Winter 2010
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: I am wondering if the terms in AMT's conditions of use that works prepared by turkers are to be considered works for hire would be considered valid. My initial instinct is that it would no...)
(No difference)

Revision as of 02:58, 7 January 2010

I am wondering if the terms in AMT's conditions of use that works prepared by turkers are to be considered works for hire would be considered valid. My initial instinct is that it would not necessarily be so.

To paraphrase, the Copyright Act defines a work for hire as:

  • 1) a work prepared by an employee within the scope of his or her employer
  • OR 2) a work specially ordered or commissioned for use as a contribution to a collective work if:
    • 1. category: is one of:
      • as part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work
      • as a translation
      • as a supplementary work – adjunct to a work made by another author
      • as a compilation
      • as an instructional text – systematic instructional activities
      • as a test
      • as answer material for a test
      • as an atlas
    • 2. intent: if the parties expressly agree in a written instrument signed by them that the work shall be considered a work made for hire

must fit into one of the 8 categories to be a contracted work made for hire (p132)