Talk:Module 7: Enforcement - Revision history

Tfisher: Removing all content from page

2009-08-30T21:27:15Z

Removing all content from page

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:27, 30 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~'''CHRIS NOTES'''~~

	*"''“I received a cease and desist letter from a publisher complaining that, by including some of his works in one of my coursepacks, I am infringing his copyright. What should I do?”''"
	**we've lost nadia and angela again!
	*"Directive 2000/31/EC (Directive on Electronic Commerce)"
	**cite?
	*"Commentators have advanced alternative '''choice-of-law rules''', including, for example, application of the law of a particular state if it is possible to localize in that state the point from which the infringing work becomes available to the public. However, there presently does not appear to be a uniform, agreed-upon analysis that governs this issue."
	**i am not sure what this means but i think it needs to be phrased more clearly
	*Article 5(2) of the Berne Convention
	**linku
	*Art. 13(1)(a) of the EU Directive 2004/48/EC on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
	**cite?
	* end case study, nadia and angela are back? furthermore, it needs to be made more explicit how the case study is related to the opening case study!

	~~KAI Notes:~~

	~~+ eIFL suggests renaming this module "Infringement and Enforcement." I can't figure out how to do this.~~

	~~+ This module should be broken into separate wiki documents to make editing easier.~~

	+ I'm concerned that much of the discussion may be US-specific without being labeled as such. For instance, do most countries require a plaintiff to establish a likelihood of success and the possibility of irreparable harm? Or is that just the US standard?

76.118.178.32 at 19:37, 8 August 2009

2009-08-08T19:37:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:37, 8 August 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*Art. 13(1)(a) of the EU Directive 2004/48/EC on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights		*Art. 13(1)(a) of the EU Directive 2004/48/EC on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
	**cite?		**cite?
	* end case study, nadia and angela are back? furthermore, ~~this~~ case study is ~~in NO WAY RELATED~~ to the opening case study!		* end case study, nadia and angela are back? furthermore, it needs to be made more explicit how the case study is related to the opening case study!

	KAI Notes:		KAI Notes:

Kisbell at 20:56, 5 August 2009

2009-08-05T20:56:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 5 August 2009
Line 18:		Line 18:

	+ This module should be broken into separate wiki documents to make editing easier.		+ This module should be broken into separate wiki documents to make editing easier.

			+ I'm concerned that much of the discussion may be US-specific without being labeled as such. For instance, do most countries require a plaintiff to establish a likelihood of success and the possibility of irreparable harm? Or is that just the US standard?

Kisbell at 18:43, 5 August 2009

2009-08-05T18:43:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 5 August 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	**cite?		**cite?
	* end case study, nadia and angela are back? furthermore, this case study is in NO WAY RELATED to the opening case study!		* end case study, nadia and angela are back? furthermore, this case study is in NO WAY RELATED to the opening case study!

			KAI Notes:

			+ eIFL suggests renaming this module "Infringement and Enforcement." I can't figure out how to do this.

			+ This module should be broken into separate wiki documents to make editing easier.

Cpeterson: New page: '''CHRIS NOTES''' *"''“I received a cease and desist letter from a publisher complaining that, by including some of his works in one of my coursepacks, I am infringing his copyright. Wh...

2009-08-05T16:38:25Z

New page: '''CHRIS NOTES''' *"''“I received a cease and desist letter from a publisher complaining that, by including some of his works in one of my coursepacks, I am infringing his copyright. Wh...

New page

'''CHRIS NOTES'''

*"''“I received a cease and desist letter from a publisher complaining that, by including some of his works in one of my coursepacks, I am infringing his copyright. What should I do?”''"
**we've lost nadia and angela again!
*"Directive 2000/31/EC (Directive on Electronic Commerce)"
**cite?
*"Commentators have advanced alternative '''choice-of-law rules''', including, for example, application of the law of a particular state if it is possible to localize in that state the point from which the infringing work becomes available to the public. However, there presently does not appear to be a uniform, agreed-upon analysis that governs this issue."
**i am not sure what this means but i think it needs to be phrased more clearly
*Article 5(2) of the Berne Convention
**linku
*Art. 13(1)(a) of the EU Directive 2004/48/EC on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
**cite?
* end case study, nadia and angela are back? furthermore, this case study is in NO WAY RELATED to the opening case study!