Talk:Module 4: Rights, Exceptions, and Limitations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
**" If Angela wants to reuse entire works, but she want also to translate excerpts of works and comment on them, will such a usage be considered as non-substantial?" | **" If Angela wants to reuse entire works, but she want also to translate excerpts of works and comment on them, will such a usage be considered as non-substantial?" | ||
**wtf does this mean? | **wtf does this mean? | ||
KAI Comments: | |||
+ Is the discussion of Austrailian copyright in databases properly included in the discussion of neighboring rights? The write up makes it sound like it's a true "copyright," rather than a neighboring right. | |||
Revision as of 02:12, 5 August 2009
CHRIS NOTES
- I barely touched http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/copyrightforlibrarians/Module_4:_Rights%2C_Exceptions%2C_and_Limitations#Library_Exceptions because the comments in the critique are so pervasive and prevalent (i.e. "this entire section needs to be redone") that it seemed foolish of me to do anything more than just fix typos and links. (i.e. I did not do any readability work).
- in the reading questions
- " If Angela wants to reuse entire works, but she want also to translate excerpts of works and comment on them, will such a usage be considered as non-substantial?"
- wtf does this mean?
KAI Comments:
+ Is the discussion of Austrailian copyright in databases properly included in the discussion of neighboring rights? The write up makes it sound like it's a true "copyright," rather than a neighboring right.