Talk:Module 6: Creative Approaches and Alternatives: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* case study is awkward and ditches nadia and angela | * case study is awkward and ditches nadia and angela | ||
* under OA i didn't touch "Journal copyright policies regarding self-archiving are analyzed by the project Sherpa RoMEO: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/. More than 50% of pay-journal policies allow their authors to archive their pre-print articles in open access repositories." because it didn't make | * under OA i didn't touch "Journal copyright policies regarding self-archiving are analyzed by the project Sherpa RoMEO: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/. More than 50% of pay-journal policies allow their authors to archive their pre-print articles in open access repositories." because it didn't make much sense to me | ||
* "Funding institutions can facilitate or compel use of one or more of these strategies – by encouraging or requiring grant recipients to make fruits of their projects publicly available. Currently, the National Institutes of Health in the United States, the European Research Council, and the Wellcome Trust in the UK underwrite in various ways the OA approach." | * "Funding institutions can facilitate or compel use of one or more of these strategies – by encouraging or requiring grant recipients to make fruits of their projects publicly available. Currently, the National Institutes of Health in the United States, the European Research Council, and the Wellcome Trust in the UK underwrite in various ways the OA approach." | ||
** don't know what this is trying to say, didn't touch | ** don't know what this is trying to say, didn't touch | ||
* close of case study: angela and nadia are back | * close of case study: angela and nadia are back??? | ||
Revision as of 14:36, 8 August 2009
- case study is awkward and ditches nadia and angela
- under OA i didn't touch "Journal copyright policies regarding self-archiving are analyzed by the project Sherpa RoMEO: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/. More than 50% of pay-journal policies allow their authors to archive their pre-print articles in open access repositories." because it didn't make much sense to me
- "Funding institutions can facilitate or compel use of one or more of these strategies – by encouraging or requiring grant recipients to make fruits of their projects publicly available. Currently, the National Institutes of Health in the United States, the European Research Council, and the Wellcome Trust in the UK underwrite in various ways the OA approach."
- don't know what this is trying to say, didn't touch
- close of case study: angela and nadia are back???