Talk:Module 5: Managing Rights: Difference between revisions

From EdX Copyright Online Course
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Removing all content from page)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''CHRIS NOTES'''


* the licensor obligations section is particularly terrible from a substantive standpoint
* clickwrap: "While many legal systems have not fully addressed the effect of these types of licenses, courts in some countries have ruled that a valid consent, giving rise to a binding contracts, can be formed in these fashions.
[edit]" and others have not, correct?
* need cite for "Articles 11bis(2) and Article 13(1) of the Berne Convention"
* "Even where exclusive rights are involved, other non-voluntary forms of collective management may be permissible under the Berne Convention. For example, extended collective management allows a collective society to license the works of all copyright holders for a certain creative class once they represent a large number of that class. This generally includes foreign and non-member copyright owners."
** probably should give an example here - perhaps a brief explanation of GBS?
*"This technique is also sometimes called (misleadingly) digital rights management (DRM)."
** should probably explain WHY it is misleading
*"Japan, which operates a compulsory licensing system for orphan works codified in Section 8, Article 67 of its copyright laws"
**cite?
*sidenote: why are none of the examples in any of these modules from the developing world? isn't this aimed at the DW? how helpful will it be?
KAI comments:
+ eIFL suggest moving the section "Licenses in the digital environment" before the section on the content of standard licensing agreements.
+ Add unconscionable to glossary.
+ eIFL wants to include more discussion of reproductive rights organazations in the collective management discussion.

Latest revision as of 16:54, 30 August 2009

Retrieved from "http://cyber.harvard.edu/cx/?title=Talk:Module_5:_Managing_Rights&oldid=2138"