Talk:Module 6: Creative Approaches and Alternatives: Difference between revisions

From EdX Copyright Online Course
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: * case study is awkward and ditches nadia and angela * under OA i didn't touch "Journal copyright policies regarding self-archiving are analyzed by the project Sherpa RoMEO: http://www.sh...)
 
(Removing all content from page)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
* case study is awkward and ditches nadia and angela
 
* under OA i didn't touch "Journal copyright policies regarding self-archiving are analyzed by the project Sherpa RoMEO: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/. More than 50% of pay-journal policies allow their authors to archive their pre-print articles in open access repositories." because it didn't make any sense
* "Funding institutions can facilitate or compel use of one or more of these strategies – by encouraging or requiring grant recipients to make fruits of their projects publicly available.  Currently, the National Institutes of Health in the United States, the European Research Council, and the Wellcome Trust in the UK underwrite in various ways the OA approach."
** don't know what this is trying to say, didn't touch
* close of case study: angela and nadia are back??? what is going on???

Latest revision as of 16:28, 30 August 2009

Retrieved from "http://cyber.harvard.edu/cx/?title=Talk:Module_6:_Creative_Approaches_and_Alternatives&oldid=2126"