Talk:Module 5: Managing Rights: Difference between revisions

From EdX Copyright Online Course
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: '''CHRIS NOTES''' * the licensor obligations section is particularly terrible from a substantive standpoint * clickwrap: "While many legal systems have not fully addressed the effect of ...)
 
(Removing all content from page)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''CHRIS NOTES'''


* the licensor obligations section is particularly terrible from a substantive standpoint
* clickwrap: "While many legal systems have not fully addressed the effect of these types of licenses, courts in some countries have ruled that a valid consent, giving rise to a binding contracts, can be formed in these fashions.
[edit]" and others have not, correct?
* need cite for "Articles 11bis(2) and Article 13(1) of the Berne Convention"
* "Even where exclusive rights are involved, other non-voluntary forms of collective management may be permissible under the Berne Convention. For example, extended collective management allows a collective society to license the works of all copyright holders for a certain creative class once they represent a large number of that class. This generally includes foreign and non-member copyright owners."
** probably should give an example here - perhaps a brief explanation of GBS?
*"This technique is also sometimes called (misleadingly) digital rights management (DRM)."
** should probably explain WHY it is misleading
*"Japan, which operates a compulsory licensing system for orphan works codified in Section 8, Article 67 of its copyright laws"
**cite?
*sidenote: why are none of the examples in any of these modules from the developing world? isn't this aimed at the DW? how helpful will it be?

Latest revision as of 16:54, 30 August 2009