Talk:Module 1: Copyright and the Public Domain: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Comments from KAI:
-+ Under "What is Copyright" - how far do we want to go with promoting a particular view? I toned down the language -- "According to them, copyright law should focus on inspiring creativity, not enriching authors. Many important copyright laws imply this viewpoint" -- since this seems to be more advocacy than teaching.  But the ultimate balance is for someone else to strike.
-+ Need to include definitions of sound recordings and commissioned works in the glossary.
-+ In the section "What does copyright law cover" - I changed the example because it might be misleading to tell people that they can rewrite newspaper articles.  While I think it's ridiculous, the Supreme Court has not yet driven a stake through the heart of the "hot news" doctrine.
-+ Changed the definition of economic rights, since the old one seemed to imply that noncommercial uses weren't covered.
-+ In addition to linking to Wikipedia for the discussion of what works are in the public domain, we may also want to link to the ALA's new widget: http://www.librarycopyright.net/digitalslider/
-+ The term "creative freedoms" seems a bit off... It also makes the discussion of licensing in this section a bit strange. I moved the licensing discussion up to try to deal with this, but it still strikes me as odd.

Latest revision as of 00:32, 2 September 2009