Diagnostic Kits/Priorities for Personalized Medicine - Revision history

WikiSysop at 19:48, 4 May 2010

2010-05-04T19:48:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, 4 May 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:

	*'''Recommended Patent Exemption''': "The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (PCAST, 2008, page 28)		*'''Recommended Patent Exemption''': "The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (PCAST, 2008, page 28)
			=Navigation=
			[[Category:Diagnostic_Kits]]
			[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/commonsbasedresearch/Diagnostic_Kits#Resources DK Bibliography]<br>
			[[Diagnostic_Kits]]<br>
			[[Main Page]]

AClearwater at 15:21, 7 December 2009

2009-12-07T15:21:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 7 December 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	**Personal Genomes and Genetic Profiles		**Personal Genomes and Genetic Profiles

	*'''Recommended Patent Exemption''': "The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (page 28)		*'''Recommended Patent Exemption''': "The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (PCAST, 2008, page 28)

AClearwater at 19:50, 30 November 2009

2009-11-30T19:50:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 30 November 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	**Personal Genomes and Genetic Profiles		**Personal Genomes and Genetic Profiles

	*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (page 28)		*'''Recommended Patent Exemption''': "The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (page 28)

AClearwater at 19:49, 30 November 2009

2009-11-30T19:49:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 30 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), September 2008 Available at: http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/PCAST/pcast_report_v2.pdf		Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), September 2008 Available at: http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/PCAST/pcast_report_v2.pdf

	*"The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) believes that the convergence of scientific		*"The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) believes that the convergence of scientific and clinical opportunity and public health need represented by personalized medicine warrants significant public and private sector action to facilitate the development and introduction into clinical practice of this promising class of new medical products." (page 1)
	and clinical opportunity and public health need represented by personalized medicine warrants significant public
	and private sector action to facilitate the development and introduction into clinical practice of this promising
	class of new medical products." (page 1)
	*This report remains relevent to our research due to its description of the diagnostic tools used in personalized medicine including:		*This report remains relevent to our research due to its description of the diagnostic tools used in personalized medicine including:
	**Molecular Diagnostics		**Molecular Diagnostics

AClearwater at 19:48, 30 November 2009

2009-11-30T19:48:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, 30 November 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	and private sector action to facilitate the development and introduction into clinical practice of this promising		and private sector action to facilitate the development and introduction into clinical practice of this promising
	class of new medical products." (page 1)		class of new medical products." (page 1)
	**This report remains relevent to our research due to its description of the diagnostic tools used in personalized medicine including:		*This report remains relevent to our research due to its description of the diagnostic tools used in personalized medicine including:
	***Molecular Diagnostics		**Molecular Diagnostics
	***Personal Genomes and Genetic Profiles		**Personal Genomes and Genetic Profiles

	*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (page 28)		*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (page 28)

AClearwater at 19:48, 30 November 2009

2009-11-30T19:48:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, 30 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), September 2008 Available at: http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/PCAST/pcast_report_v2.pdf		Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), September 2008 Available at: http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/PCAST/pcast_report_v2.pdf

	*"The ~~US Secretary’s Advisory Committee~~ on ~~Genetics, Health,~~ and ~~Society~~ (~~SACGHS~~) ~~has recommended~~ the ~~“creation of an exemption from liability for infringement~~ of ~~patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted~~ and ~~narrow exemption could not have been thought up~~ and ~~it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law~~ and ~~the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled~~ to ~~patent protection? Is not~~ the ~~patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’~~ and ~~not discoveries?~~" (page 28)		*"The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) believes that the convergence of scientific
			and clinical opportunity and public health need represented by personalized medicine warrants significant public
			and private sector action to facilitate the development and introduction into clinical practice of this promising
			class of new medical products." (page 1)
			**This report remains relevent to our research due to its description of the diagnostic tools used in personalized medicine including:
			***Molecular Diagnostics
			***Personal Genomes and Genetic Profiles

	*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (page 28)		*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (page 28)

AClearwater at 23:07, 13 November 2009

2009-11-13T23:07:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:07, 13 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), September 2008 Available at: http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/PCAST/pcast_report_v2.pdf		Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), September 2008 Available at: http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/PCAST/pcast_report_v2.pdf

	*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not		*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries?" (page 28)
	have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries?" (page 28)

	*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (page 28)		*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (page 28)

AClearwater at 23:07, 13 November 2009

2009-11-13T23:07:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:07, 13 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), September 2008 Available at: http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/PCAST/pcast_report_v2.pdf		Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), September 2008 Available at: http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/PCAST/pcast_report_v2.pdf

	*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption		*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not
	from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not
	have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries?" (page 28)		have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries?" (page 28)

	*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption		*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (page 28)
	from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (page 28)

AClearwater at 23:07, 13 November 2009

2009-11-13T23:07:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:07, 13 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), September 2008 Available at: http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/PCAST/pcast_report_v2.pdf		Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), September 2008 Available at: http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/PCAST/pcast_report_v2.pdf

	*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption		*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption

AClearwater: added notes on Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST)

2009-11-13T23:07:15Z

added notes on Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST)

New page

*Priorities for Personalized Medicine, Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), September 2008 Available at: http://www.ostp.gov/galleries/PCAST/pcast_report_v2.pdf

*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption
from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not
have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries?" (page 28)

*"The US Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics,Health, and Society (SACGHS) has recommended the “creation of an exemption
from liability for infringement of patent claims on genes for anyone making, using, ordering, offering for sale, or selling a test developed under the patent for patient care purposes”.146 A more convoluted and narrow exemption could not have been thought up and it begs the question: how can an independent committee made up of experts in the fields of intellectual property law and the relevant sciences conclude that a human gene is an ‘invention’ and therefore legally entitled to patent protection? Is not the patent system only about protecting ‘inventions’ and not discoveries? (page 28)