Diagnostic Kits/IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits - Revision history

BerkmanSysop: UTurn to 1287450000

2025-05-12T19:25:41Z

UTurn to 1287450000

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:25, 12 May 2025
(No difference)

Mac at 17:51, 13 March 2010

2010-03-13T17:51:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 13 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== What are the 5 to 10 biggest non-profit companies in this field? ==		== What are the 5 to 10 biggest non-profit companies in this field? ==
	* MIT, stanford, other schools?
	* Coriell Personal Medicine Collaborative - cpmc.coriell.org		* Coriell Personal Medicine Collaborative - cpmc.coriell.org
	* Personal Genome Project at Harvard		* Personal Genome Project at Harvard
	* Diagnostics for All (Whitesides paper microfluidics - based diagnostics; tests non-DNA biomarkers)		* Diagnostics for All (Whitesides paper microfluidics - based diagnostics; tests non-DNA biomarkers)
			* see [[IP_Profile_of_Universities_working_in_Kits]] for universities

	== How is the market distributed? ==		== How is the market distributed? ==

Mac at 17:50, 13 March 2010

2010-03-13T17:50:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 13 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==~~Answer~~ the ~~questions:~~==		== What are the 5 to 10 biggest non-profit companies in this field? ==
			* MIT, stanford, other schools?
			* Coriell Personal Medicine Collaborative - cpmc.coriell.org
			* Personal Genome Project at Harvard
			* Diagnostics for All (Whitesides paper microfluidics - based diagnostics; tests non-DNA biomarkers)

	~~#What are the 5 to 10 biggest non-profit companies in this field?~~		== How is the market distributed? ==
	#*How is the market distributed?
	#*Where are they located? Are there any incentives for specific locations?		#*Where are they located? Are there any incentives for specific locations?
	#*Correlate them with their main outputs (Data. Narratives. Tools)		#*Correlate them with their main outputs (Data. Narratives. Tools)
Line 8:		Line 11:
	#*Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants).		#*Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants).
	#*Identify what non-profits are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field.(Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant and helpful questions)		#*Identify what non-profits are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field.(Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant and helpful questions)


	==Navigation==		==Navigation==

AClearwater: IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits moved to Diagnostic Kits/IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits

2009-11-20T19:28:47Z

IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits moved to Diagnostic Kits/IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:28, 20 November 2009
(No difference)

AClearwater at 15:49, 3 September 2009

2009-09-03T15:49:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 3 September 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==How is the market distributed?==		==Answer the questions:==
	==Where are they located? Are there any incentives for specific locations?==
	==Correlate them with their main outputs (Data, Narratives, Tools)==		#What are the 5 to 10 biggest non-profit companies in this field?
	==Understand and identify cases where these companies are “experimenting” or “adopting” commons-based approaches==		#*How is the market distributed?
	==Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)==		#*Where are they located? Are there any incentives for specific locations?
	==Identify what non-profits are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field. (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant and helpful questions)==		#*Correlate them with their main outputs (Data. Narratives. Tools)
			#*Understand and identify cases where these companies are “experimenting” or “adopting” commons based approaches
			#*Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants).
			#*Identify what non-profits are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field.(Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant and helpful questions)

	==Navigation==		==Navigation==

AClearwater at 15:38, 3 September 2009

2009-09-03T15:38:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 3 September 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)==		==Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)==
	==Identify what non-profits are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field. (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant and helpful questions)==		==Identify what non-profits are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field. (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant and helpful questions)==

			==Navigation==
			[[Category:Diagnostic_Kits]]
			[[Main Page]]
			[[Diagnostic_Kits]]

AClearwater: New page: ==How is the market distributed?== ==Where are they located? Are there any incentives for specific locations?== ==Correlate them with their main outputs (Data, Narratives, Tools)== ==Under...

2009-09-03T15:26:21Z

New page: ==How is the market distributed?== ==Where are they located? Are there any incentives for specific locations?== ==Correlate them with their main outputs (Data, Narratives, Tools)== ==Under...

New page

==How is the market distributed?==
==Where are they located? Are there any incentives for specific locations?==
==Correlate them with their main outputs (Data, Narratives, Tools)==
==Understand and identify cases where these companies are “experimenting” or “adopting” commons-based approaches==
==Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)==
==Identify what non-profits are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field. (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant and helpful questions)==