Diagnostic Kits/Bibliography by Research Question - Revision history

Mac: /* IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in Kits */

2010-04-17T22:04:22Z

IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in Kits

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:04, 17 April 2010
Line 112:		Line 112:

	*DNA testing providers, Available at: http://dnatestindex.com/providers/ [last accessed April 17, 2010]		*DNA testing providers, Available at: http://dnatestindex.com/providers/ [last accessed April 17, 2010]

			* Pressman, L., Rohrbaugh, M., and Stephen Finley. "Preliminary Findings from a Population Level Study of DNA Patents." ''SACGHS Public Consultation Draft Report on Gene Patents and Licensing Practices and Their Impact on Patient Access to Genetic Tests''. (2009) pp. 1-11

	= IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits =		= IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits =

AClearwater: /* Competitive advantages in Kits */

2010-04-17T22:02:47Z

Competitive advantages in Kits

@@ Line 92: / Line 92: @@
 **[[Diagnostic_Kits/A clearing house for diagnostic testing: the solution to ensure access to and use of patented genetic inventions|Highlights]]
 = Competitive advantages in Kits =
 = IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in Kits =

Mac: /* Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector */

2010-04-17T22:00:18Z

Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 17 April 2010
Line 40:		Line 40:

	= Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector =		= Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector =
			*Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society ''Public Consultation Draft Report on Gene Patents and Licensing Practices and Their Impact on Patient Access to Genetic Tests - Appendix 1: Compendium of Case Studies on the Impact of Gene Patents and Licensing Practices on Access to Genetic Testing.'' (2009) Available at: http://oba.od.nih.gov/SACGHS/sacghs_documents.html#GHSDOC_011.
			** [[SACGHS Appendix 1- Compendium of Case Studies on the Impact of Gene Patents and Licensing Practices on Access to Genetic Testing\|highlights]]

	= Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits =		= Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits =

AClearwater: /* IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in Kits */

2010-04-17T21:59:59Z

IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in Kits

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 17 April 2010
Line 93:		Line 93:

	= IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in Kits =		= IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in Kits =

			*Component Database, Available at: http://www.medibix.com/CompanySearch.jsp?cs_choice=c&clt_choice=t&treepath=16842&stype=i [last accessed April 17, 2010]

			*DNA testing providers, Available at: http://dnatestindex.com/providers/ [last accessed April 17, 2010]

	= IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits =		= IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits =

AClearwater: /* IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits */

2010-04-17T21:54:41Z

IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 17 April 2010
Line 95:		Line 95:

	= IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits =		= IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits =

			*Coriell Personal Medicine Collaborative, Available at: cpmc.coriell.org [last accessed April 17, 2010].

			*Diagnostics for All, Available at: http://www.dfa.org/ [last accessed April 17, 2010] (Whitesides paper microfluidics - based diagnostics; tests non-DNA biomarkers).

			*Personal Genome Project at Harvard Available at: http://www.personalgenomes.org/ [last accessed April 17, 2010].

	= IP Profile of Universities working in Kits =		= IP Profile of Universities working in Kits =

Mac: /* Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits */

2010-04-17T21:53:26Z

Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:53, 17 April 2010
Line 42:		Line 42:

	= Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits =		= Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits =
			* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1248ebo.pdf Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.] 560 F.3d 1366 C.A.Fed. (Mass., 2009)

			* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/06-1634.pdf Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Biogen IDEC], 304 Fed. Appx. 866 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

			* Correspondence and Submissions Relating to CellPro March-In Petition. (2008, April 3). Retrieved April 17, 2010, from http://www.nih.gov/icd/od/foia/cellpro/index.htm

			* [http://www.patentlyo.com/08-964-chakrabarty.pdf Diamond v. Chakrabarty], 447 U.S. 303 (1980)

			*Geertrui Van Overwalle et al., 2005. ''Models for facilitating access to patents on genetic inventions''. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v7/n2/full/nrg1765.html [Accessed August 10, 2009].
			**[[Diagnostic_Kits/Models for facilitating access to patents on genetic inventions\|Highlights]]

			* [http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/127/case.html Funk Brothers v. Kalo], 333 U.S. 127 (1948) ... 10-11, 15

			* [http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/127/case.html Gottschalk v. Benson], 409 U.S. 63 (1972) ... 9

			* Holman, Christopher M., The Impact of Human Gene Patents on Innovation and Access: A Survey of Human Gene Patent Litigation. UMKC Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 295, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1090562

			* Holman, Christopher. 2008 (Nov 4). "Applying Bilski to Biotechnology and the Life Sciences." ''Patently-O.'' http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/applying-bilski.html.

			*J.D, M.A.H.P. & Munzer, S.R., Intellectual Property Rights in Genes and Gene Fragments: A Registration Solution for Expressed Sequence Tags. SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=241236 [Accessed October 30, 2009].

			* Howlett, M.J. & Christie, A.F., An Analysis of the Approach of the European, Japanese and United States Patent Offices to Patenting Partial DNA Sequences (ESTs). SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=573184 [Accessed October 30, 2009].

			* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/07-1130.pdf In re Bilski], 545 F.3d 943 (C.A.Fed., 2008.).

			* [http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/%C3%A2%C2%80%C2%8Bfedcirdecision/%C3%A2%C2%80%C2%8B04-1465.pdf In re Fisher], 421 F.3d 1365, 1371 (Fed.Cir. 2005).

			* Microbiological Research Corp. v. Muna, 625 P.2d 690, 700 (Utah 1981)

			* Mueller, J.M., Public Access Versus Proprietary Rights in Genomic Information: What Is the Proper Role of Intellectual Property Rights? SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1367849 [Accessed October 30, 2009].

			* Noonan, Kevin. 2009 (Feb 5). "Applying In re Bilski to Diagnostic Method Claims." ''Patent Docs''. http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/02/applying-in-re-bilski-to-diagnostic-method-claims.html

			* Noonan, Kevin. 2009 (Sept 16). "Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services (Fed. Cir. 2009)." ''Patent Docs''. http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/09/prometheus-laboratories-inc-v-mayo-collaborative-services-fed-cir-2009.html

			* [http://faculty.law.pitt.edu/madison/patent/supplement/oreilly_v_morse.html O'Reilly v. Morse], 56 U.S. 62 (1853)

			* Pressman, L. et al., 2006. ''The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey''. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39
			**[[Diagnostic_Kits/The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions\|Highlights]]

			* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1403.pdf Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services]. 2009 WL 2950232 C.A.Fed. (Cal.,2009).

			*Verbeure, B. et al., 2006. ''Patent pools and diagnostic testing. Trends in Biotechnology'', 24(3), 115-120.(Verbeure et al. 2006) Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TCW-4J4HK5P-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=8c0fd5a6f1431a3cbfc9ff2f37470c3b [Accessed August 8, 2009].
			**[[Diagnostic_Kits/Patent pools and diagnostic testing\|Highlights]]

			*Esther van Zimmeren et al. 2006. ''Bulletin of the World Health Organization - A clearing house for diagnostic testing: the solution to ensure access to and use of patented genetic inventions?'' Available at: http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862006000500013 [Accessed August 10, 2009].
			**[[Diagnostic_Kits/A clearing house for diagnostic testing: the solution to ensure access to and use of patented genetic inventions\|Highlights]]

	= Competitive advantages in Kits =		= Competitive advantages in Kits =

Mac: /* Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector */

2010-04-17T21:53:18Z

Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:53, 17 April 2010
Line 40:		Line 40:

	= Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector =		= Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector =

	* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1248ebo.pdf Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.] 560 F.3d 1366 C.A.Fed. (Mass., 2009)

	* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/06-1634.pdf Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Biogen IDEC], 304 Fed. Appx. 866 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

	* Correspondence and Submissions Relating to CellPro March-In Petition. (2008, April 3). Retrieved April 17, 2010, from http://www.nih.gov/icd/od/foia/cellpro/index.htm

	* [http://www.patentlyo.com/08-964-chakrabarty.pdf Diamond v. Chakrabarty], 447 U.S. 303 (1980)

	*Geertrui Van Overwalle et al., 2005. ''Models for facilitating access to patents on genetic inventions''. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v7/n2/full/nrg1765.html [Accessed August 10, 2009].
	**[[Diagnostic_Kits/Models for facilitating access to patents on genetic inventions\|Highlights]]

	* [http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/127/case.html Funk Brothers v. Kalo], 333 U.S. 127 (1948) ... 10-11, 15

	* [http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/127/case.html Gottschalk v. Benson], 409 U.S. 63 (1972) ... 9

	* Holman, Christopher M., The Impact of Human Gene Patents on Innovation and Access: A Survey of Human Gene Patent Litigation. UMKC Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 295, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1090562

	* Holman, Christopher. 2008 (Nov 4). "Applying Bilski to Biotechnology and the Life Sciences." ''Patently-O.'' http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/applying-bilski.html.

	*J.D, M.A.H.P. & Munzer, S.R., Intellectual Property Rights in Genes and Gene Fragments: A Registration Solution for Expressed Sequence Tags. SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=241236 [Accessed October 30, 2009].

	* Howlett, M.J. & Christie, A.F., An Analysis of the Approach of the European, Japanese and United States Patent Offices to Patenting Partial DNA Sequences (ESTs). SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=573184 [Accessed October 30, 2009].

	* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/07-1130.pdf In re Bilski], 545 F.3d 943 (C.A.Fed., 2008.).

	* [http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/%C3%A2%C2%80%C2%8Bfedcirdecision/%C3%A2%C2%80%C2%8B04-1465.pdf In re Fisher], 421 F.3d 1365, 1371 (Fed.Cir. 2005).

	* Microbiological Research Corp. v. Muna, 625 P.2d 690, 700 (Utah 1981)

	* Mueller, J.M., Public Access Versus Proprietary Rights in Genomic Information: What Is the Proper Role of Intellectual Property Rights? SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1367849 [Accessed October 30, 2009].

	* Noonan, Kevin. 2009 (Feb 5). "Applying In re Bilski to Diagnostic Method Claims." ''Patent Docs''. http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/02/applying-in-re-bilski-to-diagnostic-method-claims.html

	* Noonan, Kevin. 2009 (Sept 16). "Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services (Fed. Cir. 2009)." ''Patent Docs''. http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/09/prometheus-laboratories-inc-v-mayo-collaborative-services-fed-cir-2009.html

	* [http://faculty.law.pitt.edu/madison/patent/supplement/oreilly_v_morse.html O'Reilly v. Morse], 56 U.S. 62 (1853)

	* Pressman, L. et al., 2006. ''The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey''. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39
	**[[Diagnostic_Kits/The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions\|Highlights]]

	* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1403.pdf Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services]. 2009 WL 2950232 C.A.Fed. (Cal.,2009).

	*Verbeure, B. et al., 2006. ''Patent pools and diagnostic testing. Trends in Biotechnology'', 24(3), 115-120.(Verbeure et al. 2006) Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TCW-4J4HK5P-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=8c0fd5a6f1431a3cbfc9ff2f37470c3b [Accessed August 8, 2009].
	**[[Diagnostic_Kits/Patent pools and diagnostic testing\|Highlights]]

	*Esther van Zimmeren et al. 2006. ''Bulletin of the World Health Organization - A clearing house for diagnostic testing: the solution to ensure access to and use of patented genetic inventions?'' Available at: http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862006000500013 [Accessed August 10, 2009].
	**[[Diagnostic_Kits/A clearing house for diagnostic testing: the solution to ensure access to and use of patented genetic inventions\|Highlights]]

	= Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits =		= Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits =

AClearwater: /* IP Profile of Universities working in Kits */

2010-04-17T21:48:45Z

IP Profile of Universities working in Kits

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:48, 17 April 2010
Line 97:		Line 97:
	= IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits =		= IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits =

	= IP Profile of Universities working in Kits =		= IP Profile of Universities working in Kits =

			*Henry, M.R., Cho, M.K., Weaver, M.A., Merz, J.F. ''A pilot survey on the licensing of DNA inventions''. J. Law Med. Ethics, 31:442-449, 2003 Available at: http://www.bioethics.upenn.edu:16080/prog/ethicsgenes/ [Accessed September 10, 2009].
			**[[Diagnostic_Kits/A pilot survey on the licensing of DNA inventions\|Highlights]]

			*Pressman, L. et al., 2006. ''The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey''. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39
			**[[Diagnostic_Kits/The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions\|Highlights]]

	= IP Profile of Associations in Kits =		= IP Profile of Associations in Kits =

Mac: /* Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector */

2010-04-17T21:47:48Z

Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 17 April 2010
Line 52:		Line 52:
	**[[Diagnostic_Kits/Models for facilitating access to patents on genetic inventions\|Highlights]]		**[[Diagnostic_Kits/Models for facilitating access to patents on genetic inventions\|Highlights]]

	* [http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/127/case.html Funk Brothers v. Kalo, 333 U.S. 127 (1948) ... 10-11, 15		* [http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/127/case.html Funk Brothers v. Kalo], 333 U.S. 127 (1948) ... 10-11, 15

	* [http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/127/case.html Gottschalk v. Benson], 409 U.S. 63 (1972) ... 9		* [http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/127/case.html Gottschalk v. Benson], 409 U.S. 63 (1972) ... 9

Mac: /* Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector */

2010-04-17T21:47:11Z

Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 17 April 2010
Line 44:		Line 44:

	* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/06-1634.pdf Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Biogen IDEC], 304 Fed. Appx. 866 (Fed. Cir. 2008)		* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/06-1634.pdf Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Biogen IDEC], 304 Fed. Appx. 866 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

			* Correspondence and Submissions Relating to CellPro March-In Petition. (2008, April 3). Retrieved April 17, 2010, from http://www.nih.gov/icd/od/foia/cellpro/index.htm

	* [http://www.patentlyo.com/08-964-chakrabarty.pdf Diamond v. Chakrabarty], 447 U.S. 303 (1980)		* [http://www.patentlyo.com/08-964-chakrabarty.pdf Diamond v. Chakrabarty], 447 U.S. 303 (1980)

			*Geertrui Van Overwalle et al., 2005. ''Models for facilitating access to patents on genetic inventions''. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v7/n2/full/nrg1765.html [Accessed August 10, 2009].
			**[[Diagnostic_Kits/Models for facilitating access to patents on genetic inventions\|Highlights]]

			* [http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/127/case.html Funk Brothers v. Kalo, 333 U.S. 127 (1948) ... 10-11, 15

			* [http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/127/case.html Gottschalk v. Benson], 409 U.S. 63 (1972) ... 9

	* Holman, Christopher M., The Impact of Human Gene Patents on Innovation and Access: A Survey of Human Gene Patent Litigation. UMKC Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 295, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1090562		* Holman, Christopher M., The Impact of Human Gene Patents on Innovation and Access: A Survey of Human Gene Patent Litigation. UMKC Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 295, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1090562

	* Holman, Christopher. 2008 (Nov 4). "Applying Bilski to Biotechnology and the Life Sciences." ''Patently-O.'' http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/applying-bilski.html.		* Holman, Christopher. 2008 (Nov 4). "Applying Bilski to Biotechnology and the Life Sciences." ''Patently-O.'' http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/applying-bilski.html.

			*J.D, M.A.H.P. & Munzer, S.R., Intellectual Property Rights in Genes and Gene Fragments: A Registration Solution for Expressed Sequence Tags. SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=241236 [Accessed October 30, 2009].

	* Howlett, M.J. & Christie, A.F., An Analysis of the Approach of the European, Japanese and United States Patent Offices to Patenting Partial DNA Sequences (ESTs). SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=573184 [Accessed October 30, 2009].		* Howlett, M.J. & Christie, A.F., An Analysis of the Approach of the European, Japanese and United States Patent Offices to Patenting Partial DNA Sequences (ESTs). SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=573184 [Accessed October 30, 2009].

	* [http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/127/case.html Gottschalk v. Benson], 409 U.S. 63 (1972) ... 9

	* [http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/US/409/409.US.63.-.71.485.html Gottschalk v. Benson], 409 U.S. 63 (1972) ... 9

	* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/07-1130.pdf In re Bilski], 545 F.3d 943 (C.A.Fed., 2008.).		* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/07-1130.pdf In re Bilski], 545 F.3d 943 (C.A.Fed., 2008.).

	* [http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/%C3%A2%C2%80%C2%8Bfedcirdecision/%C3%A2%C2%80%C2%8B04-1465.pdf In re Fisher], 421 F.3d 1365, 1371 (Fed.Cir. 2005).		* [http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/%C3%A2%C2%80%C2%8Bfedcirdecision/%C3%A2%C2%80%C2%8B04-1465.pdf In re Fisher], 421 F.3d 1365, 1371 (Fed.Cir. 2005).

			* Microbiological Research Corp. v. Muna, 625 P.2d 690, 700 (Utah 1981)

	* Mueller, J.M., Public Access Versus Proprietary Rights in Genomic Information: What Is the Proper Role of Intellectual Property Rights? SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1367849 [Accessed October 30, 2009].		* Mueller, J.M., Public Access Versus Proprietary Rights in Genomic Information: What Is the Proper Role of Intellectual Property Rights? SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1367849 [Accessed October 30, 2009].
Line 66:		Line 75:

	* Noonan, Kevin. 2009 (Sept 16). "Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services (Fed. Cir. 2009)." ''Patent Docs''. http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/09/prometheus-laboratories-inc-v-mayo-collaborative-services-fed-cir-2009.html		* Noonan, Kevin. 2009 (Sept 16). "Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services (Fed. Cir. 2009)." ''Patent Docs''. http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/09/prometheus-laboratories-inc-v-mayo-collaborative-services-fed-cir-2009.html

			* [http://faculty.law.pitt.edu/madison/patent/supplement/oreilly_v_morse.html O'Reilly v. Morse], 56 U.S. 62 (1853)

	* Pressman, L. et al., 2006. ''The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey''. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39		* Pressman, L. et al., 2006. ''The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey''. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39
Line 71:		Line 82:

	* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1403.pdf Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services]. 2009 WL 2950232 C.A.Fed. (Cal.,2009).		* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1403.pdf Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services]. 2009 WL 2950232 C.A.Fed. (Cal.,2009).

			*Verbeure, B. et al., 2006. ''Patent pools and diagnostic testing. Trends in Biotechnology'', 24(3), 115-120.(Verbeure et al. 2006) Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TCW-4J4HK5P-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=8c0fd5a6f1431a3cbfc9ff2f37470c3b [Accessed August 8, 2009].
			**[[Diagnostic_Kits/Patent pools and diagnostic testing\|Highlights]]

			*Esther van Zimmeren et al. 2006. ''Bulletin of the World Health Organization - A clearing house for diagnostic testing: the solution to ensure access to and use of patented genetic inventions?'' Available at: http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862006000500013 [Accessed August 10, 2009].
			**[[Diagnostic_Kits/A clearing house for diagnostic testing: the solution to ensure access to and use of patented genetic inventions\|Highlights]]

	= Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits =		= Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits =