Diagnostic Kits/The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions

From Commons Based Research
< Diagnostic Kits
Revision as of 13:15, 11 September 2009 by AClearwater (talk | contribs) (added Pressman Highlights)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Pressman, L. et al., 2006. The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39

  • (Pressman, L. et al., 2006) The Pressman article reports on an interview which investigates DNA patents at Universities in the United States. The focus of the article is split between:
    • patenting and out-licensing strategies of
    • licensing negotiations: exclusivity, uses, and terms
    • Protection of non-patented technologies: MTAs, NDAs
  • Institutions chosen for the study had patents of inventions using human DNA and both for profit and non-profits were sampled. The study found that for profit and non-profit entities approach patent and licenses differently:
    • Patenting Behavior
      • For profits more often fill patent applications for all new technologies and then deciding what to pursue based on commercial interest.
      • Non-profits were more selective about when to apply for a patent.
    • Licensing Behavior
    • For both entities, licensing was most often used as a method of commercialization. Licensing for research was very infrequent.
    • One important difference found was that nonprofits were more than twice as likely to license exclusively as compared to for-profit companies.

Exclusivity see Schissel et al (footnote 8)