Biotechnology - Genomic and Proteomics/Overview of Economics of Intellectual Property in BGP/Bibliography for Item 1 in BGP: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:


* Murray, Fiona et al. (Philippe Aghion & Mathias Dewatripont & Julian Kolev & Scott Stern) (2009). "Of Mice and Academics: Examining the Effect of Openness on Innovation," NBER Working Papers 14819, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/14819.html
* Murray, Fiona et al. (Philippe Aghion & Mathias Dewatripont & Julian Kolev & Scott Stern) (2009). "Of Mice and Academics: Examining the Effect of Openness on Innovation," NBER Working Papers 14819, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/14819.html
** [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/commonsbasedresearch/Murray_et_all_-_here Highlights]


*Owen-Smith, Jason, and Walter W. Powell. 2003. "The Expanding Role of University Patenting in the Life Sciences: Assessing the Importance of Experience and Connectivity." Research Policy 32(9): 1695-1711
*Owen-Smith, Jason, and Walter W. Powell. 2003. "The Expanding Role of University Patenting in the Life Sciences: Assessing the Importance of Experience and Connectivity." Research Policy 32(9): 1695-1711

Revision as of 18:14, 22 April 2010

Used Resources

  • Cohen, W., M.R. Florida AND W.R. Gore 1994, "University-Industry Research Centers in the United States," Center for Economic Development, School of Public Policy Management, Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Dasgupta, P. and P.A. David 1987, “Information Disclosure and the Economics of Science and Technology,” pp. 519-542 in: G. Feiwel (ed.), Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory, University Press: New York.
  • Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research Author(s): Michael A. Heller and Rebecca S. Eisenberg Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 280, No. 5364 (May 1, 1998), pp. 698-701
  • Henderson, R., A.B. Jaffe AND M. Trajtenberg 1998, “Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 80,119-129.
  • Huang, Kenneth, F. Murray. 2008. Does Patent Strategy Shape The Long- Run Supply Of Public Knowledge? Evidence From The Human Genome. Forthcoming in Academy of Management Journal.
  • Levin, R.C., A. K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson AND S.G. “Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Winter 1987, Vol. 1987, No. 3.
  • Murray, Fiona et al. (Philippe Aghion & Mathias Dewatripont & Julian Kolev & Scott Stern) (2009). "Of Mice and Academics: Examining the Effect of Openness on Innovation," NBER Working Papers 14819, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/14819.html
  • Owen-Smith, Jason, and Walter W. Powell. 2003. "The Expanding Role of University Patenting in the Life Sciences: Assessing the Importance of Experience and Connectivity." Research Policy 32(9): 1695-1711

Unused Resources

  • "Enough with Patenting the Breast Cancer Gene" Double X http://www.doublex.com/section/health-science/enough-patenting-breast-cancer-gene
  • Dasgupta, Partha and David, Paul. 1994. "Towards a New Economics of Science" Research Policy (23), 487-521.
  • Dreyfuss, Rochelle. 2004. "Protecting the Public Domain of Science: Has the Time for an Experimental Use Defense Arrived?" 46 Arizona Law Review p.457.
  • Fauchart, E. E. Von Hippel. 2007. Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case of French Chefs. Organization Science.
  • Furman, J., S. Stern. 2006. Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: The impact of institutions on cumulative research. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
  • Marshall, Eliot. 1999. \New NIH Rules Promote Greater Sharing of Tools and Materials". Science, Vol. 286(5449), pp. 2430-2431.
  • [33] Murray, Fiona and Scott Stern. 2007. \Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scienti c Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the anti-Commons Hypothesis," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 63:4, pp. 648-687.
  • [34] Murray, Fiona. 2002. "Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering". Research Policy, Vol. 31, Issues 8-9, pp: 1389-1403.
  • [35] Murray, Fiona. 2007. \The Stem Cell Market: Patents & the Pursuit of Scientific Progress." New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 356:23, pp. 2341-2343.
  • [36] Murray, Fiona. 2008. The Oncomouse that Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies As A Source Of Productive Tension At The Boundary Of Overlapping Institutions. Forthcoming American Journal of Sociology and Working Paper, Sloan School of Management.
  • [37] Nelson, Richard R. 1959. "The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research," Journal of Political Economy 67(3), 297-306.
  • [38] O'Mahony, S. 2003. "Guarding the Commons: How Community Managed Projects Protect Their Work", Research Policy: 32, 1179-1198.
  • http://www.ocw.unu.edu/maastricht-economic-and-social-research-and-training-centre-on-innovation-and-technology
  • "H.R. 977 Genomic Research and Accessibility Act" http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-977
  • James M. Utterback and William J. Abernathy, “A Dynamic Model of Product and Process Innovation,” Omega, Vol. 3, No. 6, 1975, pp. 639-656.
  • Teece, David "Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy" Research Policy 15 (1986) 285-305
  • Gans, Joshua, et. al., "Patents, Papers, Pairs & Secrets: Contracting over the disclosure of scientific knowledge," Journal of Economic Literature Classification Number: O34.
  • Gans, Joshua, et. al., "When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction?" The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 33, No. 4 (Winter, 2002), pp. 571-586

Navigation

Overview of Economics of Intellectual Property in BGP
Biotechnology_-_Genomic_and_Proteomics