Biotechnology - Genomic and Proteomics/IP Profile of Associations in BGP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Report April 2009]] | [[Report April 2009]] | ||
= | {{TOCright}} | ||
= Research Question:= | |||
# Are there associations in this field/market (business associations, university associations, professional associations) that are relevant for the IP debate in this field? Identify their policies, recommendations and/or best practices related to IP of their members. | # Are there associations in this field/market (business associations, university associations, professional associations) that are relevant for the IP debate in this field? Identify their policies, recommendations and/or best practices related to IP of their members. | ||
Are there associations in this field/market (business associations, university associations, professional associations) that are relevant for the IP debate in this field? Identify their policies, recommendations and/or best practices related to IP of their members. | Are there associations in this field/market (business associations, university associations, professional associations) that are relevant for the IP debate in this field? Identify their policies, recommendations and/or best practices related to IP of their members. | ||
* Biotech Industry Organization | * Biotech Industry Organization | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
see [[Government in BGP]] | see [[Government in BGP]] | ||
=Navigation= | |||
[[Bibliography for Item 9 in BGP]]<br> | [[Bibliography for Item 9 in BGP]]<br> | ||
[[Biotechnology_-_Genomic_and_Proteomics]] | [[Biotechnology_-_Genomic_and_Proteomics]] |
Revision as of 20:11, 19 April 2010
Research Question:
- Are there associations in this field/market (business associations, university associations, professional associations) that are relevant for the IP debate in this field? Identify their policies, recommendations and/or best practices related to IP of their members.
Are there associations in this field/market (business associations, university associations, professional associations) that are relevant for the IP debate in this field? Identify their policies, recommendations and/or best practices related to IP of their members.
- Biotech Industry Organization
- http://www.bio.org/
- Generally strive for expansive IP law: http://bio.org/ip/
- BayBio: Northern California's Life Science Association
- http://www.baybio.org/wt/page/index
- aims to remove the double-check of product approvals between the FDA and California's Food and Drug branch
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)
- http://www.phrma.org/
- Unsurprisingly, advocates long IP protection (http://tinyurl.com/dybgkd). Interestingly, seems to advocate narrow IP protection (http://www.innovation.org/index.cfm/InnovationToday/KeyIssues)
- New York Biotechnology Association
- http://www.nyba.org/
- Seems relatively quite within the IP debate, though opposes reforms that would make it more difficult for patent holders to sue generic drug makers (http://www.nyba.org/issues-initiative.php)
- Human Genome Organization (HUGO)
- http://www.hugo-international.org/
- Organization of scientists involved in genomic research
- Aims to encourage data-sharing
- Human Proteome Organization (HUPO)
- http://www.hupo.org/
- like HUPO, aims to foster international cooperation, data-sharing
2. What is the role of Government funding in Biotech? see Government in BGP
Bibliography for Item 9 in BGP
Biotechnology_-_Genomic_and_Proteomics