Biotechnology - Genomic and Proteomics/IP Profile of Universities working in BGP: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Answer the questions:
==Answer the questions:==


# What are the 5 top Universities in this field?
# What are the 5 top Universities in this field?
Line 53: Line 53:
** HMS and Partners Center for Genetics and Genomics ([http://www.hpcgg.org/ http://www.hpcgg.org/])
** HMS and Partners Center for Genetics and Genomics ([http://www.hpcgg.org/ http://www.hpcgg.org/])
*** promotes genetics and genomics in clinical medicine
*** promotes genetics and genomics in clinical medicine
==Navigation==
[[Bibliography for Item 8 in BGP]]<br>
[[Biotechnology_-_Genomic_and_Proteomics]]

Revision as of 23:07, 15 March 2009

Answer the questions:

  1. What are the 5 top Universities in this field?
    • Correlate them with their main outputs (Data. Narratives. Tools)
    • Understand and identify cases where these universities are “experimenting” or “adopting” commons based approach. Are they adopting OA policies, for instance? Are they adopting Social Responsible License approaches?
    • Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)
    • Identify what universities are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant questions)


Note: I have bolded those projects that appear to be experimenting with commons-based approaches. From initial research, it seems that Stanford is the IBM of the university field, UC San Diego is the Microsoft

Navigation

Bibliography for Item 8 in BGP
Biotechnology_-_Genomic_and_Proteomics