Diagnostic Kits/Biotechnology and Intellectual Property Reinventing the Commons: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AClearwater (talk | contribs) (added comments about proposed legislation to reform patent law) |
AClearwater (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Problems with intellectual property protection of biotechnological inventions | *Problems with intellectual property protection of biotechnological inventions | ||
**American, Canadian and Australian Issues | **American, Canadian and Australian Issues | ||
Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
**Proposed policies to address these concerns | **Proposed policies to address these concerns | ||
***proposed legislation to reform its patent law | ***proposed legislation to reform its patent law | ||
****"The original proposal for reform included a third party submission procedure for prior art, a post- | ****"The original proposal for reform included a third party submission procedure for prior art, a post- grant opposition process with two windows for launching opposition (one, immediately after issue and a second at any time later), limitations on the availability of preliminary injunctions, adoption of a first-to-file rule (as opposed to the current first-to-invent rule), the requirement that all applications be published after 18 months (starting from the priority date) and a reinvigoration of the duty of candour." | ||
grant opposition process with two windows for launching opposition (one, immediately after | |||
issue and a second at any time later), limitations on the availability of preliminary injunctions, | |||
adoption of a first-to-file rule (as opposed to the current first-to-invent rule), the requirement | |||
that all applications be published after 18 months (starting from the priority date) and a | |||
reinvigoration of the duty of candour." | |||
****These reforms meet fairly heavy resistance and have not been successful to date. While these changes could effect patent law generally it is not clear than any of the proposed changes has any specific relevance to the field of diagnostic genetic kits. | ****These reforms meet fairly heavy resistance and have not been successful to date. While these changes could effect patent law generally it is not clear than any of the proposed changes has any specific relevance to the field of diagnostic genetic kits. |
Revision as of 13:53, 20 November 2009
- Problems with intellectual property protection of biotechnological inventions
- American, Canadian and Australian Issues
- NO AMERICAN COMMENT
- Proposed policies to address these concerns
- proposed legislation to reform its patent law
- "The original proposal for reform included a third party submission procedure for prior art, a post- grant opposition process with two windows for launching opposition (one, immediately after issue and a second at any time later), limitations on the availability of preliminary injunctions, adoption of a first-to-file rule (as opposed to the current first-to-invent rule), the requirement that all applications be published after 18 months (starting from the priority date) and a reinvigoration of the duty of candour."
- These reforms meet fairly heavy resistance and have not been successful to date. While these changes could effect patent law generally it is not clear than any of the proposed changes has any specific relevance to the field of diagnostic genetic kits.
- proposed legislation to reform its patent law
- American, Canadian and Australian Issues