Biotechnology - Genomic and Proteomics/Overview of Economics of Intellectual Property in BGP/Bibliography for Item 1 in BGP

Resources

• Philippe Aghion & Mathias Dewatripont & Jeremy C. Stein, 2008.

"Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(3), pages 617-635. http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/randje/v39y2008i3p617-635.html

• Arundel, A 2000, “Patent - The Viagra of Innovation Policy?” Internal Report to the Expert Group in the Project “Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy,” viewed 7 March 2009, <ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/innovation-policy/studies/studies_knowledge_based_economy_wp3.pdf?

• Cohen, W., M.R. Florida AND W.R. Gore 1994, "University-Industry Research Centers in the United States," Center for Economic Development, School of Public Policy Management, Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA.

• Cowan, R. and E. Harrison 2000, “Intellectual Property Rights in a Knowledge-Based Economy,” MERIT: Maastricht, viewed at 9 March 2009. <http://ideas.repec.org/p/dgr/umamer/2001026.html>

• Dam, K.W. 1998, “Self-help in the Digital Jungle,” Working Paper No. 59, University of Chicago Law and Economics, Chicago, viewed at 9 March 2009, <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/99032302.pdf?abstractid=157448&mirid=1>

• Dasgupta, P. and P.A. David 1987, “Information Disclosure and the Economics of Science and Technology,” pp. 519-542 in: G. Feiwel (ed.), Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory, University Press: New York.

• David, P.A. 1993, “Intellectual Property Institutions and the Panda’s Thumb: Patents, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History,” in: M. Wallerstein, M. Mogee, and R. Schoen (eds.), Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology, National Academy Press: Washington, DC.<http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=_vzznmeFPpcC&oi=fnd&pg=PA19dq=Intellectual+property+institutions+and+the+panda%27s+thumb:+patents,+copyrights,+and+trade+secrets+in+economic+theory+and+history,&ots=PyYxKjwxVm&sig=H84csUu-qNh0XRQZpX7cUkxePfc>

• Henderson, R., A.B. Jaffe AND M. Trajtenberg 1998, “Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 80,119-129.

• Levin, R.C., A. K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson AND S.G. “Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Winter 1987, Vol. 1987, No. 3.

• Fiona Murray & Philippe Aghion & Mathias Dewatripont & Julian Kolev & Scott Stern, 2009. "Of Mice and Academics: Examining the Effect of Openness on Innovation," NBER Working Papers 14819, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/14819.html

Further Resources

• Dasgupta, Partha and David, Paul. 1994. "Towards a New Economics of Science" Research Policy (23), 487-521.
• Dreyfuss, Rochelle. 2004. "Protecting the Public Domain of Science: Has the Time for an Experimental Use Defense Arrived?" 46 Arizona Law Review p.457.
• Fauchart, E. E. Von Hippel. 2007. Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case of French Chefs. Organization Science.
• Furman, J., S. Stern. 2006. Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: The impact of institutions on cumulative research. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
• Huang, Kenneth, F. Murray. 2008. Does Patent Strategy Shape The Long- Run Supply Of Public Knowledge? Evidence From The Human Genome. Forthcoming in Academy of Management Journal.
• Marshall, Eliot. 1999. \New NIH Rules Promote Greater Sharing of Tools and Materials". Science, Vol. 286(5449), pp. 2430-2431.
• [33] Murray, Fiona and Scott Stern. 2007. \Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scienti c Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the anti-Commons Hypothesis," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 63:4, pp. 648-687.
• [34] Murray, Fiona. 2002. "Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering". Research Policy, Vol. 31, Issues 8-9, pp: 1389-1403.
• [35] Murray, Fiona. 2007. \The Stem Cell Market: Patents & the Pursuit of Scientific Progress." New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 356:23, pp. 2341-2343.
• [36] Murray, Fiona. 2008. The Oncomouse that Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies As A Source Of Productive Tension At The Boundary Of Overlapping Institutions. Forthcoming American Journal of Sociology and Working Paper, Sloan School of Management.
• [37] Nelson, Richard R. 1959. "The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research," Journal of Political Economy 67(3), 297-306.
• [38] O'Mahony, S. 2003. "Guarding the Commons: How Community Managed Projects Protect Their Work", Research Policy: 32, 1179-1198.
• [40] Owen-Smith, Jason, and Walter W. Powell. 2003. "The Expanding Role of University Patenting in the Life Sciences: Assessing the Importance of Experience and Connectivity." Research Policy 32(9): 1695-1711
• Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research Author(s): Michael A. Heller and Rebecca S. Eisenberg Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 280, No. 5364 (May 1, 1998), pp. 698-701

Navigation

Overview of Economics of Intellectual Property in BGP
Biotechnology_-_Genomic_and_Proteomics