Alternative Energy/Impacts of Intellectual Property in AE: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Define the main legal tools of IP protection available for the field= | |||
"In the United States, energy-related matters qualify for a unique provision called a Petition to Make Special that expedites prosecution of the patent application by allowing it to jump the queue on the examiner’s docket." (pg 246) (Ward at all, 2008) | |||
=Notes= | |||
(note to R.A. - try to create a matrix that cross references the previous two questions - let's try several ways to visualize how the narratives either hit barriers based on protection or can be synergistic via open licensing approaches - an example is the table in the Case Analysis Framework) | (note to R.A. - try to create a matrix that cross references the previous two questions - let's try several ways to visualize how the narratives either hit barriers based on protection or can be synergistic via open licensing approaches - an example is the table in the Case Analysis Framework) | ||
=Navigation= | |||
[[Bibliography for Item 4 in AE]]<br> | [[Bibliography for Item 4 in AE]]<br> | ||
[[Category:Alternative Energy]] | [[Category:Alternative Energy]] | ||
[[Main Page]] | [[Main Page]] | ||
Revision as of 16:36, 16 April 2009
Define the main legal tools of IP protection available for the field
"In the United States, energy-related matters qualify for a unique provision called a Petition to Make Special that expedites prosecution of the patent application by allowing it to jump the queue on the examiner’s docket." (pg 246) (Ward at all, 2008)
Notes
(note to R.A. - try to create a matrix that cross references the previous two questions - let's try several ways to visualize how the narratives either hit barriers based on protection or can be synergistic via open licensing approaches - an example is the table in the Case Analysis Framework)