Biotechnology - Genomic and Proteomics/Data, narratives and tools produced by the BGP field: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Data) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
**Plasmid | **Plasmid | ||
*** Big players: | *** Big players: | ||
==Navigation== | ==Navigation== | ||
[[Bibliography for Item 3 in BGP]]<br> | [[Bibliography for Item 3 in BGP]]<br> | ||
[[Biotechnology_-_Genomic_and_Proteomics]] | [[Biotechnology_-_Genomic_and_Proteomics]] |
Revision as of 19:35, 14 April 2009
Answer the questions:
- Define what kind of data, narratives and tools constitute the outputs of the field and its dynamics (e.g.: data in science may get better if open once it receives annotations and can be improved by other scientist).
Data
- Foundational Data
- Big players:
- Observational Data
- Big Players:
Narratives
- Papers
- Big players:
- Ontologies
- Big players:
US National Center for Biomedical Ontology
- Annotations
- Big players:
Tools
- Biological materials, such as:
- Steam cells
- Big players:
- Steam cells
- Mice
- Big players:
- Mice
- Plasmid
- Big players:
- Plasmid
Bibliography for Item 3 in BGP
Biotechnology_-_Genomic_and_Proteomics