Diagnostic Kits/Bibliography by Research Question: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 93: Line 93:


= IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in Kits =
= IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in Kits =
*Component Database, Available at: http://www.medibix.com/CompanySearch.jsp?cs_choice=c&clt_choice=t&treepath=16842&stype=i [last accessed April 17, 2010]
*DNA testing providers, Available at: http://dnatestindex.com/providers/ [last accessed April 17, 2010]


= IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits =
= IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits =

Revision as of 16:59, 17 April 2010

Bibliographic entries used in each research question (1-12; defined by the Field Research Methodology).

Overview of Economics of Intellectual Property in Kits

  • Jensen, K. & Murray, F., 2005. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: Enhanced: Intellectual Property Landscape of the Human Genome. Science, 310(5746), 239-240.
  • Mills, A.E. & Tereskerz, P., 2008. DNA-based patents: an empirical analysis. Nat Biotech, 26(9), 993-995.
  • Pressman, L. et al., 2006. The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39

Give an overall picture of the Kits' sector

Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector

Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits

  • Holman, Christopher M., The Impact of Human Gene Patents on Innovation and Access: A Survey of Human Gene Patent Litigation. UMKC Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 295, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1090562
  • Microbiological Research Corp. v. Muna, 625 P.2d 690, 700 (Utah 1981)
  • Pressman, L. et al., 2006. The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39

Competitive advantages in Kits

IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in Kits

IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits

  • Coriell Personal Medicine Collaborative, Available at: cpmc.coriell.org [last accessed April 17, 2010].
  • Diagnostics for All, Available at: http://www.dfa.org/ [last accessed April 17, 2010] (Whitesides paper microfluidics - based diagnostics; tests non-DNA biomarkers).

IP Profile of Universities working in Kits

  • Pressman, L. et al., 2006. The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39

IP Profile of Associations in Kits

  • Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), Available at: http://www.bio.org/ [last accessed April, 17, 2010] (the world's largest biotechnology organization).

Commons based cases in Kits

  • Dequeker, Elisabeth et. al., Quality control in molecular genetic testing, Nature Reviews Genetics 2, 717–723 (1 September 2001).
  • Kalman, Lisa et. al., Development and Characterization of Reference Materials for MTHFR, SERPINA1, RET, BRCA1, and BRCA2 Genetic Testing, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2009, Vol. 11, No. 6
  • Pratt, Victoria. Development of Genomic Reference Materials for Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Testing, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

Peer-Production Business models in Kits

Open Business models in Kits

  • add entries here