Diagnostic Kits/Bibliography by Research Question: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 114: Line 114:


*Trait-o-matic, Available at: http://snp.med.harvard.edu/ [last accessed April, 17, 2010].
*Trait-o-matic, Available at: http://snp.med.harvard.edu/ [last accessed April, 17, 2010].
*Pratt, Victoria. Development of Genomic Reference Materials for Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Testing, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3


*Promethease, Available at: http://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Promethease [last accessed April, 17, 2010].
*Promethease, Available at: http://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Promethease [last accessed April, 17, 2010].
*Wilson, Jean Amos., Consensus Characterization of 16 FMR1 Reference Materials: A Consortium Study, Available at: http://jmd.amjpathol.org/cgi/content/abstract/jmoldx.2008.070105v1 [last accessed April, 17, 2010].


= Peer-Production Business models in Kits =
= Peer-Production Business models in Kits =

Revision as of 16:39, 17 April 2010

Bibliographic entries used in each research question (1-12; defined by the Field Research Methodology).

Overview of Economics of Intellectual Property in Kits

  • Jensen, K. & Murray, F., 2005. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: Enhanced: Intellectual Property Landscape of the Human Genome. Science, 310(5746), 239-240.
  • Mills, A.E. & Tereskerz, P., 2008. DNA-based patents: an empirical analysis. Nat Biotech, 26(9), 993-995.
  • Pressman, L. et al., 2006. The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39

Give an overall picture of the Kits' sector

Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector

  • Holman, Christopher M., The Impact of Human Gene Patents on Innovation and Access: A Survey of Human Gene Patent Litigation. UMKC Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 295, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1090562
  • Pressman, L. et al., 2006. The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39

Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits

Competitive advantages in Kits

IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in Kits

IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits

IP Profile of Universities working in Kits

IP Profile of Associations in Kits

Commons based cases in Kits

  • Dequeker, Elisabeth et. al., Quality control in molecular genetic testing, Nature Reviews Genetics 2, 717–723 (1 September 2001).
  • Kalman, Lisa et. al., Development and Characterization of Reference Materials for MTHFR, SERPINA1, RET, BRCA1, and BRCA2 Genetic Testing, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2009, Vol. 11, No. 6
  • Pratt, Victoria. Development of Genomic Reference Materials for Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Testing, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

Peer-Production Business models in Kits

Open Business models in Kits

  • add entries here