Diagnostic Kits/IP Profile of Universities working in Kits: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AClearwater (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
AClearwater (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
#* Identify what universities are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant questions) | #* Identify what universities are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant questions) | ||
*Henry, M.R., Cho, M.K., Weaver, M.A., Merz, J.F. [http://www.bioethics.upenn.edu:16080/prog/ethicsgenes/ A pilot survey on the licensing of DNA inventions]. J. Law Med. Ethics, 31:442-449, 2003 | |||
==Navigation== | ==Navigation== | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 6 September 2009
Answer the questions:
- What are the 5 top Universities in this field?
- Correlate them with their main outputs (Data. Narratives. Tools)
- Understand and identify cases where these universities are “experimenting” or “adopting” commons based approach. Are they adopting OA policies, for instance? Are they adopting Social Responsible License approaches?
- Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)
- Identify what universities are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant questions)
- Henry, M.R., Cho, M.K., Weaver, M.A., Merz, J.F. A pilot survey on the licensing of DNA inventions. J. Law Med. Ethics, 31:442-449, 2003