AE Essay on EFRC Survey/EFRC Resources and Bibliography: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/commonsbasedresearch/Alternative_Energy/Paper#R.26D_Investment_in_the_United_States Public Investment within USA]
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/commonsbasedresearch/Alternative_Energy/Paper#R.26D_Investment_in_the_United_States Public Investment within USA]
= Lime Survey =
= Lime Survey =
** This survey has been sent to each of the United States' Department of Energy, Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRCs). The survey was designed by Carolina Rossini, Research Fellow, and Silas Bauer, Research Associate from the Industrial Cooperation Project at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Harvard. The purpose of our research is to determine the level of "openness" or "closedness" of the research conducted in companies, institutions, and DOE labs in the alternative energy technology industry. By asking the following questions we are trying to determine if the research being conducted at one of the initial 46 EFRC is more open or more closed in regard to the level of information sharing and use of intellectual property arrangements. We were also looking for data on any knowledge sharing guidelines/rules that may be attached to the public funding the EFRC received from the US government through the DOE.  
*This survey has been sent to each of the United States' Department of Energy, Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRCs). The survey was designed by Carolina Rossini, Research Fellow, and Silas Bauer, Research Associate from the Industrial Cooperation Project at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Harvard. The purpose of our research is to determine the level of "openness" or "closedness" of the research conducted in companies, institutions, and DOE labs in the alternative energy technology industry. By asking the following questions we are trying to determine if the research being conducted at one of the initial 46 EFRC is more open or more closed in regard to the level of information sharing and use of intellectual property arrangements. We were also looking for data on any knowledge sharing guidelines/rules that may be attached to the public funding the EFRC received from the US government through the DOE.  
** [http://cooperationproject.limequery.org/admin/admin.php Lime Survey on EFRC]  
*[http://cooperationproject.limequery.org/admin/admin.php Lime Survey on EFRC]  
** [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/commonsbasedresearch/sites/commonsbasedresearch/images/LimeService_Questions4EFRC.pdf Lime Survey Questions]
*[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/commonsbasedresearch/sites/commonsbasedresearch/images/LimeService_Questions4EFRC.pdf Lime Survey Questions]
** [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/commonsbasedresearch/sites/commonsbasedresearch/images/LimeSurveyResults.pdf Lime Survey Results on EFRC]
*[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/commonsbasedresearch/sites/commonsbasedresearch/images/LimeSurveyResults.pdf Lime Survey Results on EFRC]
 
=Bibliography=
=Bibliography=
* [http://www.sc.doe.gov/bes/reports/list.html BES Basic Research Needs Reports]
* [http://www.sc.doe.gov/bes/reports/list.html BES Basic Research Needs Reports]
* [http://www.er.doe.gov/bes/brochures/files/EFRC_brochure.pdf EFRC Brochure]
* [http://www.er.doe.gov/bes/brochures/files/EFRC_brochure.pdf EFRC Brochure]
* Foss, Nail. (2007) The Emerging Knowledge Governance Approach: Challenges and Characteristics. Organization. 14: 29-52. Available at: http://org.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/14/1/29
= Navigation =  
= Navigation =  
Back to [[AE Essay on EFRC Survey]]  
Back to [[AE Essay on EFRC Survey]] <br>
Back to [[ICP Reports and Working Papers]]<br>
Back to [[ICP Reports and Working Papers]]<br>
Back to [[ICP Sectors]]<br>
Back to [[ICP Sectors]]<br>

Latest revision as of 19:22, 19 May 2010

UNDER DEVELOPMENT

Notes

Lime Survey

  • This survey has been sent to each of the United States' Department of Energy, Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRCs). The survey was designed by Carolina Rossini, Research Fellow, and Silas Bauer, Research Associate from the Industrial Cooperation Project at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Harvard. The purpose of our research is to determine the level of "openness" or "closedness" of the research conducted in companies, institutions, and DOE labs in the alternative energy technology industry. By asking the following questions we are trying to determine if the research being conducted at one of the initial 46 EFRC is more open or more closed in regard to the level of information sharing and use of intellectual property arrangements. We were also looking for data on any knowledge sharing guidelines/rules that may be attached to the public funding the EFRC received from the US government through the DOE.
  • Lime Survey on EFRC
  • Lime Survey Questions
  • Lime Survey Results on EFRC

Bibliography

Navigation

Back to AE Essay on EFRC Survey
Back to ICP Reports and Working Papers
Back to ICP Sectors
Back to Main Page