Diagnostic Kits/A pilot survey on the licensing of DNA inventions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AClearwater (talk | contribs) (New page: *(Pressman, L. et al., 2006) The Pressman article reports on an interview which investigates DNA patents at Universities in the United States. The focus of the article is split between:...) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Henry, M.R., Cho, M.K., Weaver, M.A., Merz, J.F. A pilot survey on the licensing of DNA inventions. J. Law Med. Ethics, 31:442-449, 2003 Available at: http://www.bioethics.upenn.edu:16080/prog/ethicsgenes/ [Accessed September 10, 2009]. | |||
*(Henry, M.R., et al., 2003) The Pressman article reports on an interview which investigates DNA patents at Universities in the United States. The focus of the article is split between: | |||
*( | |||
**patenting and out-licensing strategies of | **patenting and out-licensing strategies of | ||
**licensing negotiations: exclusivity, uses, and terms | **licensing negotiations: exclusivity, uses, and terms | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
***For both entities, licensing was most often used as a method of commercialization. Licensing for research was very infrequent. | ***For both entities, licensing was most often used as a method of commercialization. Licensing for research was very infrequent. | ||
***One important difference found was that nonprofits were more than twice as likely to license exclusively as compared to for-profit companies. | ***One important difference found was that nonprofits were more than twice as likely to license exclusively as compared to for-profit companies. | ||
=Navigation= | |||
[[Category:Diagnostic_Kits]] | |||
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/commonsbasedresearch/Diagnostic_Kits#Resources DK Bibliography]<br> | |||
[[Diagnostic_Kits]]<br> | |||
[[Main Page]] | |||
Latest revision as of 15:36, 4 May 2010
Henry, M.R., Cho, M.K., Weaver, M.A., Merz, J.F. A pilot survey on the licensing of DNA inventions. J. Law Med. Ethics, 31:442-449, 2003 Available at: http://www.bioethics.upenn.edu:16080/prog/ethicsgenes/ [Accessed September 10, 2009].
- (Henry, M.R., et al., 2003) The Pressman article reports on an interview which investigates DNA patents at Universities in the United States. The focus of the article is split between:
- patenting and out-licensing strategies of
- licensing negotiations: exclusivity, uses, and terms
- Protection of non-patented technologies: MTAs, NDAs
- Institutions chosen for the study had patents of inventions using human DNA and both for profit and non-profits were sampled. The study found that for profit and non-profit entities approach patent and licenses differently:
- Patenting Behavior
- For profits more often fill patent applications for all new technologies and then deciding what to pursue based on commercial interest.
- Non-profits were more selective about when to apply for a patent.
- Licensing Behavior
- For both entities, licensing was most often used as a method of commercialization. Licensing for research was very infrequent.
- One important difference found was that nonprofits were more than twice as likely to license exclusively as compared to for-profit companies.
- Patenting Behavior