Diagnostic Kits/USA Regulation Review: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
For all states that impose additional licensing or approval requirements for laboratory testing, companies manufacturing and marketing genetic tests will still be subject to any applicable FDA regulations. | For all states that impose additional licensing or approval requirements for laboratory testing, companies manufacturing and marketing genetic tests will still be subject to any applicable FDA regulations. | ||
==Types of Genetic Tests and Testing "Services"== | |||
==FDA Regulations== | |||
==CMS Regulations== | |||
==Footnotes== | |||
<references/> | |||
==Navigation== | |||
[[Main Page|ICP Main Page]]<br/> | |||
[[Diagnostic Kits]]<br/> | |||
[[Diagnostic Kits/Case Law Review|Case Law Review]] | |||
[[category:Diagnostic_Kits]] |
Revision as of 13:08, 13 May 2010
This section will detail the current state of Federal and State regulations required by government agencies for genetic tests. At present, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") regulate certain aspects of genetic testing. Although the vast majority of regulatory efforts are overseen by Federal Agencies, there are certain State-imposed standards for genetic tests that vary in scope by State.
Regulatory Agencies
Federal Agencies
The scope of FDA requirements, such as pre-market regulatory approvals, that apply to companies offering genetic tests depend almost entirely on the nature of the genetic test offered. In some cases, manufacturers must meet stringent requirements before marketing a genetic test, whereas in others, there are little or no substantive requirements.
CMS requires certain laboratory standards for all laboratories that conduct testing for patients in the United States. The requirements imposed by this agency are still somewhat dependent on the nature of testing conducted on the premises. For certain complex tests, including some genetic testing, laboratories must be approved by CMS and may require certain levels of supervision by highly trained individuals conducting the testing. However, for simpler tests, laboratories may perform testing without stringent oversight
State Agencies
Certain states have become increasingly involved in administering genetic testing oversight. In some cases, where states have implemented their own regulatory schemes for laboratories, laboratories located within an applicable state have become exempt from the requirements imposed by CMS. In other cases, laboratories located in a state which have state-mandated regulations that apply to laboratories must also meet CMS regulations.
New York and the state of Washington are two primary examples of where laboratories are exempt from CMS regulation. New York requires any laboratory which conducts testing to be evaluated and approved by license by the New York Department of Health before any testing can be conducted. Interestingly, these requirements also apply to laboratories that obtain specimens from patients residing within the state. Some commentators believe many laboratories avoid offering genetic testing services to New York residents.
California is an example of a state where laboratories must be both state and CMS regulations for clinical laboratory testing. Laboratories must obtain an approval license issued by the state before conducting direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
For all states that impose additional licensing or approval requirements for laboratory testing, companies manufacturing and marketing genetic tests will still be subject to any applicable FDA regulations.