Diagnostic Kits/The Manchester Manifesto: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AClearwater (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
***[http://bulletin.sciencebusiness.net/ebulletins/showissue.php3?ch=1&page=%2F548%2Fart%2F15978 Manchester Manifesto calls for new view on commercialising science] | ***[http://bulletin.sciencebusiness.net/ebulletins/showissue.php3?ch=1&page=%2F548%2Fart%2F15978 Manchester Manifesto calls for new view on commercialising science] | ||
**[http://www.isei.manchester.ac.uk/ The University of Manchester Institute for Science Ethics and Innovation] | **[http://www.isei.manchester.ac.uk/ The University of Manchester Institute for Science Ethics and Innovation] | ||
=Navigation= | |||
[[Category:Diagnostic_Kits]] | |||
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/commonsbasedresearch/Diagnostic_Kits#Resources DK Bibliography]<br> | |||
[[Diagnostic_Kits]]<br> | |||
[[Main Page]] |
Latest revision as of 14:49, 4 May 2010
- The Manchester Manifesto
- Main Points
- "a response to the threat posed by the current system of Intellectual Property" [[1]
- "a first attempt to answer the question ‘Who Owns Science?" [2]
- Statement of the Problem: the current Intellectual Property system has efficiency drawbacks as well as possible ethical problems.
- Possible alternations to the Current Intellectual Property System Mentioned: "patent pools, voluntary or compulsory licensing, and differential pricing"
- Alternative Intellectual Property Mechanisms Mentioned: remuneration-based patents, prize funds, and completely open-access models
- Discussion
- The University of Manchester Institute for Science Ethics and Innovation
- Main Points